This is simply yet another example of people going entirely by whether something would be really cool and great narrative, and if so they believe it and/or post it. Facts to back up the claim are unneeded when they love the narrative. Facts which prove the opposite will be ignored or fought against.
Trump might be in control of the military. If he is, no one has found a publicly available document to show this. This one is most certainly not it.
How about people having evidence that supports their claim in the first place?
Sorry Patriot, when an OP posts claimed evidence that in no way says what he claims on it, then it's a fail, rather than "Ooooh what a cool narrative, let's go with that, maybe enough digging by someone other than OP will support it!"
I just read the 6 pages in the link and I don’t see where it says the President retains control of the military.
It doesn't say what the OP claims. At all.
This is simply yet another example of people going entirely by whether something would be really cool and great narrative, and if so they believe it and/or post it. Facts to back up the claim are unneeded when they love the narrative. Facts which prove the opposite will be ignored or fought against.
Trump might be in control of the military. If he is, no one has found a publicly available document to show this. This one is most certainly not it.
This isn't hopium, this is crapium.
It may be the wrong section. Keep diggjng
How about people having evidence that supports their claim in the first place?
Sorry Patriot, when an OP posts claimed evidence that in no way says what he claims on it, then it's a fail, rather than "Ooooh what a cool narrative, let's go with that, maybe enough digging by someone other than OP will support it!"
I already dug. This is 100% unsupported.
If you disagree, provide the sauce. Thank you.