It's amending something else, so to know what it's actually doing you'd need to look at "Section 3 of the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (3 U.S.C. 102 note)" I'm looking at it right now to see about this whole thing. gimme a bit
EDIT: I've had a look at the document (not a lawyer, it's confusing as hell, may be wrong), and I'm not able to find anything that supports OP's claim here. It may well be buried reeeeal deep to throw anyone off it's trail, I may be wrong and blind, or it might not be in there at all. Try looking yourself here if you've got a good head on your shoulders. click notes and scroll down by a bit.
It's a gate to keep people out and dependant on legal experts. Unless you devote significant time to understanding legalese/jargon it's nearly impossible to decipher.
This is simply yet another example of people going entirely by whether something would be really cool and great narrative, and if so they believe it and/or post it. Facts to back up the claim are unneeded when they love the narrative. Facts which prove the opposite will be ignored or fought against.
Trump might be in control of the military. If he is, no one has found a publicly available document to show this. This one is most certainly not it.
How about people having evidence that supports their claim in the first place?
Sorry Patriot, when an OP posts claimed evidence that in no way says what he claims on it, then it's a fail, rather than "Ooooh what a cool narrative, let's go with that, maybe enough digging by someone other than OP will support it!"
I fear you are only deluding yourself if you refuse to realize that Biden is president. A puppet president and fraudulently installed but president no less. I also think the odds of him being forcibly removed by the military are near zero but Nancy and her cohorts will remove him within months and we will have to suffer through several years of a Harris presidency; yet another puppet This nightmare will not end quickly, peaceably, or easily. We face a decade of economic and civil chaos.
I just read the 6 pages in the link and I don’t see where it says the President retains control of the military.
It's amending something else, so to know what it's actually doing you'd need to look at "Section 3 of the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (3 U.S.C. 102 note)" I'm looking at it right now to see about this whole thing. gimme a bit
EDIT: I've had a look at the document (not a lawyer, it's confusing as hell, may be wrong), and I'm not able to find anything that supports OP's claim here. It may well be buried reeeeal deep to throw anyone off it's trail, I may be wrong and blind, or it might not be in there at all. Try looking yourself here if you've got a good head on your shoulders. click notes and scroll down by a bit.
Thanks but reading that kind of stuff hurts my brain. I don’t know why legal documents can’t just be straight forward and to the point!
It's a gate to keep people out and dependant on legal experts. Unless you devote significant time to understanding legalese/jargon it's nearly impossible to decipher.
You are correct. Others seeing this.
You're not the only one. Lots have tried to fine that part and have come up empty-handed!
It doesn't say what the OP claims. At all.
This is simply yet another example of people going entirely by whether something would be really cool and great narrative, and if so they believe it and/or post it. Facts to back up the claim are unneeded when they love the narrative. Facts which prove the opposite will be ignored or fought against.
Trump might be in control of the military. If he is, no one has found a publicly available document to show this. This one is most certainly not it.
This isn't hopium, this is crapium.
It may be the wrong section. Keep diggjng
How about people having evidence that supports their claim in the first place?
Sorry Patriot, when an OP posts claimed evidence that in no way says what he claims on it, then it's a fail, rather than "Ooooh what a cool narrative, let's go with that, maybe enough digging by someone other than OP will support it!"
I already dug. This is 100% unsupported.
If you disagree, provide the sauce. Thank you.
Me neither but then most of it was incomprehensible to me.
I fear you are only deluding yourself if you refuse to realize that Biden is president. A puppet president and fraudulently installed but president no less. I also think the odds of him being forcibly removed by the military are near zero but Nancy and her cohorts will remove him within months and we will have to suffer through several years of a Harris presidency; yet another puppet This nightmare will not end quickly, peaceably, or easily. We face a decade of economic and civil chaos.