This simple phrase shows the complete hypocrisy of the Dem voters.
Everything they vote for supports corporate America.
They consume corporate America news.
Corporate America is imposing Marxist ideology. Cancel culture etc.
I called one of my coworkers a corporate fascist and his head exploded and simply pointed out his hypocrisy that you can’t be a Bernie bro and vote dem as the Dems are the party of corporate America. His brain crashed harder then windows vista I definitely hit a nerve.
We should use one of their favorite words “fascism” and turn it against them.
This could maybe be an easy way to redpill people if we all start referring to them as corporate fascists. Nothing would piss these people off more then showing them how they are boot lickers for corporate America. Just an idea.
Thanks for sharing! Someone else posted here they just say "that's been debunked" every time a liberal shares a 'covid' fact, whether it has been or not. They will likely not even challenge you he said.
Liberals know they are wildly uninformed but they believe they are morally right - they feel their positions are emotionally correct - and that means they see all the details and information and backstory on any of these issues as just “noise”. This is how they justify talking out of their ass about shit they don’t really know about. However, they are also in a state of constant inferiority about this. They know they are just repeating a line from a Colbert monologue and haven’t actually looked into anything.
So if you are able to start to expose that ignorance in a non-threatening, non-aggressive way, it is quite effective. Don’t try to humiliate them, because that just drives them further into their position. Be more conversational. “That’s interesting, but how do you feel that affects the <subtle aspect of issue they had never even heard about>?” Now they are really on the spot. You have just given them new information, but they don’t know what the assigned talking points are yet. So they have to think it through for themselves. And this is when they get cautious. They don’t want to appear uncompassionate and they don’t want to appear uninformed. At this point it is pretty easy to subtly take the moral high ground since you are the person more informed - you are the person who actually cared enough to research it.
It’s like a dude at a party bragging about how much he cares about the homeless. How it’s his number one passion and the thing he’s dedicating his life to. Then another dude at the party asks him what he thinks about the new Tuesday Night Initiative at the Soup Kitchen on the corner of Franklin and 9th, and whether he voted with the board for or against the extension. And the first dude is sitting there like... uhhhh, he hasn’t heard about any of this. He’s never even been to that soup kitchen. All he’s done is take a course on British poverty in the 20th century and read half of The Road to Wigan Pier. It’s all theoretical virtue signalling. But he cannot say this so he just gets silent and shifty. And now he’s on the defensive. “How often do you volunteer at that soup kitchen? I am there every weekend and most Wednesday nights. I haven’t seen you around.” “Oh I go to this other soup kitchen.” “Which one? Templeton in Springfield? Or Old Ma’s Place down by the docks? I’m good friends with Pamela, the organizer there. Do you know Pamela?” You just keep exposing their ignorance and their empty virtue signalling, but you do it in a friendly way. Eventually these people break and just admit, “They don’t really follow politics.” But you ACTUALLY have to care more for this tactic to work. You actually have to go do the research and know more than these people.