I just released a maxed-out post about Q's instructions to "paint the picture" in exactly the conspiratorial way, and his reasons for doing so. We all know this means there will be mistakes and some groupthink to "sift" through as we bake our bread, and that is an accepted sideline of free thought. The best analyses rise to the top. Q also instructed that timestamps and other references are important (usually not digital sums, which are the poor man's gematria), and seems to have knowledge of when certain events (CPAC) can be forced to be coordinated to occur (Trump's speech on the 4th anniversary of his Joint Session speech; not a direct Q proof, but a proof of coordination among white hats).

The focus of my research is that we should be constantly memorializing our discoveries in new graphics (which defeat anti-propagation measures of the deep state) and that we are free to ignore the chaff because our efforts will suffice for "daily bread". If an emotional appeal (even a sticky) is particularly egregious, state why with calm facts and logic and message the moderators, who have also nobly moderated themselves when they push a policy a bit too far.