I'm not responding to the vax issue - there's literally a whole thread about it on the main page where everyone is discussing it and I dont have the energy to keep going over it.
As for Assange, we do not know what the plan is or who is involved and what it relies on. Faith, speculation and logical reasoning are key parts of Q research. For example; how do we know HRC isn't already arrested and/or dead? How do we know Kappy and Epstein are actually dead and not in witness protection? We cannot prove these things yet, but we follow the crumbs and circumstantial evidence from the crumbs and research into an educated theory.
It's hard to provide proof when we are only able to analyse the fringe fallout of an all out global shadow war. If you cannot cope with speculating, researching and trusting, then maybe Q is not for you, fren.
If it is all about proof for you, (and the Q proofs vids don't convince you), then perhaps you would be feel better to hang out over on the Patriots.doom board :)
I'm not responding to the vax issue - there's literally a whole thread about it on the main page where everyone is discussing it and I dont have the energy to keep going over it.
As for Assange, we do not know what the plan is or who is involved and what it relies on. Faith, speculation and logical reasoning are key parts of Q research. For example; how do we know HRC isn't already arrested and/or dead? How do we know Kappy and Epstein are actually dead and not in witness protection? We cannot prove these things yet, but we follow the crumbs and circumstantial evidence from the crumbs and research into an educated theory.
It's hard to provide proof when we are only able to analyse the fringe fallout of an all out global shadow war. If you cannot cope with speculating, researching and trusting, then maybe Q is not for you, fren.
If it is all about proof for you, (and the Q proofs vids don't convince you), then perhaps you would be feel better to hang out over on the Patriots.doom board :)