Pompeo's Latest Tweet - "blessing" "worship" and high praise for the "Italian bass player"
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
I love how genuinely nice Mrs. Pompeo looks.
"Italian Based Player"
Is this an indirect reference to ItalyGate? Pompeo is liking the "Italian whistleblower" because info is coming out to the public soon?
I don't know but just trying to interpret Pompeo's tweets as best as I can.
What relevance does this have?
Not sure exactly, but Pompeo's tweets have long been considered to be some type of comms.
I found the reference to an Italian bass played of particular interest given the suggestions floating around in January that Italy played a role in the election fraud.
No one has found any significant verified secret comm from his tweets. Lots of people were stretching for meaning but ultimately never found any.
According to you? I've seen plenty.
Can you give one example of these significant secret comms?
Surely you’re not talking about the time of the tweet correlating with one of the 90% of Q drops than can be considered relevant every single day since it was first posted?
Are you serious? At most, a reference that they’re fighting China. Big deal. That is no secret.
I could point you to my post: https://greatawakening.win/p/11S0gMg7Py/this-wouldnt-upload-before-does-/c/
Or I would point out the very timely bible verses, like the one shortly after inauguration saying God's plan is the one that matters. To me it's pretty obvious Pompeo and Scavino are talking to us. I would call that comms, but I'm no expert.
That post is meaningless. 13-14 supposedly points to Q post 1314, which is some future comm markers that told us nothing. You could point to 90% of Q drops any day of the year and some noob could consider it relevant to “today”.
When is a Bible verse ever untimely or irrelevant to a Christian?
Your comment is meaningless.
I wrote a 20 page pdf doing a pseudo-mathematical proof about the flag and lock binary tweet. With very very generous boundaries, it came to 1/5,000,000 chance of the message randomly organizing in a coherent Q message. Idk how to link a pdf but check that one out it's a good one!
1/5,000,000?
Yeah I gave very wide boundaries for what constitutes an acceptable message that reflected the Q post 503 associated with the two tweets I think. I think it was like 5m and then I made the boundaries as wide as possible and it was like 1.8m or 1.3m or some number like... If you narrow the boundaries it quickly becomes much much lower odds like 1/100m and upwards etc. etc.