Explaining it this way to normies who think they know anything about “QAnon” has worked as a relatively easy eye opener in my experience. I’d be interested in hearing what you guys say (if anything) when normies/lefties start talking about the MSM’s “QAnon” nonsense?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
If those that wish to discredit just say "Q," then its a single person, or small group. No one cares if a single person no one knows says crazy things. If they just say "Anon's," the group is too big and there is no connection between random people no one knows and Q that no one knows.
When they say Qanon, it links the people who say stupid things, while stumbling blindly in the dark, trying to figure out reality, with the person or small group that says smart things, trying to wake up humanity. With the term Qanon ALL of the things said by an individual are said by the whole group, thus discrediting Q and making all Anon's look like idiots because a few say stupid or doomer things (or things that sound "crazy" in their explorations, even though they might be true).
It is similar to turning all 4chan into hackers. There is that "guilty by association" thing in there, but the abuse of the term Qanon goes much deeper and is more insidious than just guilt. Its a complete discrediting of EVERYTHING said by EVERYONE that even comes close to an association, simply by creating an association that doesn't actually exist.
Thus is the Luciferian's MO.