Loose change is one of the best presented, however, it is also one with many factual inaccuracies. When he tried to fix it later he made more errors than corrected.
Good red pill tool, but more of a starting point of research.
I was working night shift and got woken up with a phone call telling me about "crazy shit in New York". Told him that it was a response to actions in the middle east OR if they have a mastermind before the dust settles it is because they did it to themselves. Then went back to sleep.
It wasn't long after waking up and turned on the TV, annoyed because I didn't want to watch the New York action movie on every channel... oh wait that is real and happening now. Who is Bin Laden?
That'd be how I realized it was a false flag (did not know the term at the time).
Yup a lot of shady things happened that day! Like detective would do, who gained from it. There was a lot of money and plans that went into effect that day. Before 9/11 and watching loose change I was a happy sheep. I took the 9/11 attacks personally because my dad was a firefighter working that day in between NYC and DC he worked right by the naval academy in Annapolis MD.a lot of his friends/ coworkers went to NYC and The pentagon to help rescue survivors my dad didn't go because he was older about to retire.Alot of them came down with cancer years later very sad.
The best you could do is to read the NIST report. It's written for engineers, but really highlights the failure of investigation for the actual accepted theory by the experts.
The way it works:
A) The plane collision and impact damage is a reasonable explanation, if the plane could have penetrated the 1" thick red iron structural columns, it would have approximately damaged the wing area least with most in the fuselage and engines. The insulation stripped IN THE ZONE DAMAGED, starting gas fires.
B) fire analysis assumes ALL INSULATION REMOVED, then does a reasonable extrapolation of fire spread and mention the localised temperature increase in the steel structure, and weakens with temperature. Correctly notes that the fires would only burn a local area for about 10 min before moving for lack of fuel.
C) Failure analysis assumes that once the temperatures do not cool down as the fire moves on. The steel weakened for collapse initiation, and once the top of the structure started moving that it would cause total structural failure, because that's what was seen.
All assumptions mentioned are never STATED only used as assumptions.
It's long, but well worth it. Trust me. There are things in here I had never heard about before like there being TWO pentagon security can videos, not one. And then proceed to prove one was manipulated.
loose change is great. it's more of a behind the scenes documentary
Loose change is one of the best presented, however, it is also one with many factual inaccuracies. When he tried to fix it later he made more errors than corrected.
Good red pill tool, but more of a starting point of research.
agreed! That was my red pill moment in 03 when it came out!
I was working night shift and got woken up with a phone call telling me about "crazy shit in New York". Told him that it was a response to actions in the middle east OR if they have a mastermind before the dust settles it is because they did it to themselves. Then went back to sleep.
It wasn't long after waking up and turned on the TV, annoyed because I didn't want to watch the New York action movie on every channel... oh wait that is real and happening now. Who is Bin Laden?
That'd be how I realized it was a false flag (did not know the term at the time).
Yup a lot of shady things happened that day! Like detective would do, who gained from it. There was a lot of money and plans that went into effect that day. Before 9/11 and watching loose change I was a happy sheep. I took the 9/11 attacks personally because my dad was a firefighter working that day in between NYC and DC he worked right by the naval academy in Annapolis MD.a lot of his friends/ coworkers went to NYC and The pentagon to help rescue survivors my dad didn't go because he was older about to retire.Alot of them came down with cancer years later very sad.
People often ask what did happen, the only 100% for sure is "not the official version".
The treatment of the first responders only serves as further evidence.
100%
9/11 In Plane Sight also good.
Even though AJ produced it I say Loose Change the Final Draft or edit or whatever is prolly the best.
Zeitgeist is also good but skip the first section about religion which is very disinfo.
Here is a good one. Includes the JFK assassination too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdm20ncMCvU
September Clues
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Vle9KDFKfWYN/
Addendum
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ogg17vKKxCCu/
Good place to start.
The Great American Psy-Opera.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zcEdAsSa6ghO/
Outstanding. ~{°¡°}~
I watched the first part of Dr. Judy Wood's presentation. I learned a lot I didn't know. Will go back to watch the rest when I have time.
The best you could do is to read the NIST report. It's written for engineers, but really highlights the failure of investigation for the actual accepted theory by the experts.
The way it works: A) The plane collision and impact damage is a reasonable explanation, if the plane could have penetrated the 1" thick red iron structural columns, it would have approximately damaged the wing area least with most in the fuselage and engines. The insulation stripped IN THE ZONE DAMAGED, starting gas fires.
B) fire analysis assumes ALL INSULATION REMOVED, then does a reasonable extrapolation of fire spread and mention the localised temperature increase in the steel structure, and weakens with temperature. Correctly notes that the fires would only burn a local area for about 10 min before moving for lack of fuel.
C) Failure analysis assumes that once the temperatures do not cool down as the fire moves on. The steel weakened for collapse initiation, and once the top of the structure started moving that it would cause total structural failure, because that's what was seen.
All assumptions mentioned are never STATED only used as assumptions.
The official explanation is seriously that poor
I've watched them all and in my opinion this is by far the best...
September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor
https://youtu.be/wnOpdJ1orQM
It's long, but well worth it. Trust me. There are things in here I had never heard about before like there being TWO pentagon security can videos, not one. And then proceed to prove one was manipulated.
https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf
Read this too, compelling towards the arguement
I love y’all. So much immediate interaction. Special community we got here
Any books and video of / by Rebekah Roth. She was a stewardess who dug into all of the happenings of 9-11 from the perspective of a stewardess.
ae911truth.org check these guys out!
That French brother doc. They were there when it happened. Really good doc.
My favorite that includes all the back door deals.
9/11 Trillions: Follow the money
https://youtu.be/n3xgjxJwedA