Funny enough (or not)... NaturalNews sourced an article that in no way correlated the Covid19 vaccine mRNA to cancer causing as is suggested. The article was only referring to naturally occurring mRNA. It's a pretty pathetic attempt. There are much better arguments and reasons to not get the vaccine. This ain't one of them.
Regardless this can be used to show that it's not "settled science" or particularly safe. It can be used to show that it is a shot in the dark (maybe literally).
While I agree the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not shown to be safe (far from it) and that they are "a shot in the dark" in the sense that you mean it, this article can NOT be used to show that. As PurpleTea stated above, there is zero meaningful relationship between the topic of this article and the immunotherapy (mislabeled as a vaccine) that are being injected into the unwitting masses.
To put it simply, people who are completely clueless about molecular and cellular biology (as the author of the article clearly is) should not be writing stories about those topics. This article is what we call "disinformation."
Funny enough (or not)... NaturalNews sourced an article that in no way correlated the Covid19 vaccine mRNA to cancer causing as is suggested. The article was only referring to naturally occurring mRNA. It's a pretty pathetic attempt. There are much better arguments and reasons to not get the vaccine. This ain't one of them.
Not many people read source any more...
Regardless this can be used to show that it's not "settled science" or particularly safe. It can be used to show that it is a shot in the dark (maybe literally).
While I agree the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not shown to be safe (far from it) and that they are "a shot in the dark" in the sense that you mean it, this article can NOT be used to show that. As PurpleTea stated above, there is zero meaningful relationship between the topic of this article and the immunotherapy (mislabeled as a vaccine) that are being injected into the unwitting masses.
To put it simply, people who are completely clueless about molecular and cellular biology (as the author of the article clearly is) should not be writing stories about those topics. This article is what we call "disinformation."
Follow the link above to the article in Nature.
Believe what you want