It’s important to note that mRNAs are a normal component of all cells and the specific ones discussed here are not involved in mRNA-based vaccines, like the one developed against SARS-CoV-2.
Though the quote and cited paper are not immediately related.
Being a retard in all things biology, I can't conclude whether the vaccine would put you at increased risk of cancer.
That mRNA is a normal component in a process to produce proteins, hacking that particular system with an artificial interference is questionable, unless you know exactly what you are doing.
To compare:
Say you have a container in a piece of code. Say: $DNA. Within this container is a list of sequences: ABCG.
When the program calls on $DNA, it gets fueled with ABCG.
So far so good, right.
What if, you introduce a piece of code, that calls on $DNA, but it rearranges the sequence to GCBA, or ABGC, or BACG, etc.
The result is not what you normally get, but something completely different, something garbled.
That garbled piece may or may not help in targeting one specific issue, but introduced at a specific level of the program, it can totally render the original program useless.
That is exactly what we are looking at. Breaking the natural barriers and processes to do what? The consequences are quite clear. Training your body to produce one specific product, invests the whole natural body.
Highly doubtful... no study is cited, nor are any Sloan-Kettering researchers named. Red flags.
They did a terrible job at formatting, but if you dig through the sources you arrive at:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-018-0465-8
As well as:
Though the quote and cited paper are not immediately related.
Being a retard in all things biology, I can't conclude whether the vaccine would put you at increased risk of cancer.
That mRNA is a normal component in a process to produce proteins, hacking that particular system with an artificial interference is questionable, unless you know exactly what you are doing.
To compare:
Say you have a container in a piece of code. Say: $DNA. Within this container is a list of sequences: ABCG.
When the program calls on $DNA, it gets fueled with ABCG.
So far so good, right.
What if, you introduce a piece of code, that calls on $DNA, but it rearranges the sequence to GCBA, or ABGC, or BACG, etc.
The result is not what you normally get, but something completely different, something garbled.
That garbled piece may or may not help in targeting one specific issue, but introduced at a specific level of the program, it can totally render the original program useless.
That is exactly what we are looking at. Breaking the natural barriers and processes to do what? The consequences are quite clear. Training your body to produce one specific product, invests the whole natural body.
This "Vaccine" IS the virus.
Good dig, I couldn't find that citation. Thanks... and you're right, I don't immediately see the connection either.