Came across this photo on Amazon while browsing for books for my baby. There’s no way this was an accident
(media.greatawakening.win)
? These people are sick! ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
Back in the good ol' days that was called a rooster.
These people are sick.
Back in even older days was called a cock, and to this day the proper name for a male birds is cock, e.g. peacocks are the males peahens are female. Look in bird fancier literature. Male pigeons and guinea fowl are cocks. Jesus said "before the cock crows thrice" -- He wasn't talking sex. Shutoff valves in kegs are cocks or stopcocks and the resemblence to a male organ led to the relatively recent slang use. I know I'll get downvoted by all the people looking for evil everywhere but get a grip, this is a valid use of an old word. Maybe children should learn proper meanings instead of slang.
GAY used to mean happy or blissful
I absolutely believe it was bastardized, intentionally.
Btw, notice something else about the book? Tails of animals hang off the edge of the pages, inviting the child to put them in their mouth. It's literally a grooming device.
If you can't see the suggestive content in this AD, you're a fucking retard or a pedo.
Furthermore, when a child is teething a pacifier or a binkie is the proper remedy, not devices that encourage the child to put anything and everything in its mouth. First of all, it's fucking DANGEROUS for the child and could lead to poisoning or choking. Not to mention, many of these products are made in China and full of PCB's or worse. This book is telling a child to put animal parts in it's mouth and suggests beastiality.
So which is it? Are you stupid and arrogant, or are you a pedo?