Between 356, then 22 (esp. the last three sentences), would 55, in light of the actual message of the Psalm (55:22), be what he is intending to communicate via twitter without actually using "exactly this?" My take away as toward us is those last three sentences of 22.
So is Podesta the first indictment?
Has anyone ever discusssd the thoughts on the indictment? Do you think it’ll be related to previous Ukraine investigation?
Yeah
Tony Podesta
Trump pointedly pointed him out related to Ukraine
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-scrutiny-on-tony-podesta-as-trump-directly-asked-why-he-hasnt-been-charged
Between 356, then 22 (esp. the last three sentences), would 55, in light of the actual message of the Psalm (55:22), be what he is intending to communicate via twitter without actually using "exactly this?" My take away as toward us is those last three sentences of 22.
This isn't how you read the USC, though....
They aren't codes that are in effect, in the sense of being actioned.
They're codes that are current.
I'm simply saying, from a legal standpoint, the USC is merely just a collation of codes that govern how laws can be executed.
So the USC can't be read as laws in effect.
The code is the affect of the law, in so much that it's what allows certain laws to be actioned upon. They by themselves, aren't a law.