Disinformation is necessary. Drop 1685, 1114, 158, etc. (May I suggest searching all Q drops with the word “disinformation”. Drop 4101 is interesting.)
No outside comms (drop 1318)
BUT
Backchannels are important (drop 4536 and many others, search for “backchannels”)
Following up on my question about the comms: can you explain what a back channel would be? Would that be channels not publicized or are Pompeo, Scavino, et al considered back channels? When Kayleigh, Dan, et al post pictures that are clearly related to Q, how do these people factor into Q if only a handful of people know the inside information?
I know it seems like I'm a normie, but I'm not. I've been following, and when someone raises a question, I always apply it to other aspects. I call this critical thinking, and I'm actually asking for the critical thinking of others that can prove or deny the direction I'm going. I guess you could say I'm following the directions of Q post 4101
That's what I'm saying the Q operation is a backchannel they use to communicate with us. It doesn't mean there are other backchannels. So Q can say "backchannels are important" and "no outside comms" and there is no contradiction.
Well... I’m fairly satisfied at the conclusion of this rollercoaster today haha. I’ll move on from George unless something unexpected comes up. Ah well...
All I can say is-
Disinformation is necessary. Drop 1685, 1114, 158, etc. (May I suggest searching all Q drops with the word “disinformation”. Drop 4101 is interesting.)
No outside comms (drop 1318)
BUT
Backchannels are important (drop 4536 and many others, search for “backchannels”)
HELLO GEORGE (drop 529)
Use discernment. Caveat emptor.
Following up on my question about the comms: can you explain what a back channel would be? Would that be channels not publicized or are Pompeo, Scavino, et al considered back channels? When Kayleigh, Dan, et al post pictures that are clearly related to Q, how do these people factor into Q if only a handful of people know the inside information?
I know it seems like I'm a normie, but I'm not. I've been following, and when someone raises a question, I always apply it to other aspects. I call this critical thinking, and I'm actually asking for the critical thinking of others that can prove or deny the direction I'm going. I guess you could say I'm following the directions of Q post 4101
Yeah I was reading 4101 earlier.
Discernment...
I thought that when when Q talks about backchannels they are talking about the Q operation itself.
Wouldn’t that be “a backchannel”?
That's what I'm saying the Q operation is a backchannel they use to communicate with us. It doesn't mean there are other backchannels. So Q can say "backchannels are important" and "no outside comms" and there is no contradiction.
Well... I’m fairly satisfied at the conclusion of this rollercoaster today haha. I’ll move on from George unless something unexpected comes up. Ah well...