11
bgny 11 points ago +11 / -0

Love you too my fren, thanks for all you do and providing us an awesome frenly space, like no other on the net!

1
bgny 1 point ago +1 / -0

The counter to the “Operation Trust” narrative:

  1. Q did not tell people to “do nothing”. In fact, it activated millions of people who were previously politically disengaged. Anons were encouraged to research, dig, question narratives, redpill others, and fight the information war. That’s not pacification—that’s mobilization.

  2. There was no illusion of elite saviors alone fixing it all. While some interpreted "trust the plan" passively, many understood it as part of a larger strategy that required public involvement, especially in spreading awareness. The entire Great Awakening concept hinges on mass participation—not waiting.

  3. Why was it so heavily censored if it was meant to pacify? If Q was really a pacification op, it wouldn't have been the target of mass censorship, deplatforming, media hit pieces, or FBI bulletins. They don’t deplatform distractions—they censor threats. That alone suggests its influence was seen as subversive, not suppressive.

  4. Millions did wake up, and truth spread. Regardless of any specific outcome, Q pushed people to question media, investigate power structures, and speak out. If the goal was passivity, it failed—because it actually woke people up.

4
bgny 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually, you can't. This forum is for Q supporters not contrarians waiting for their moment to say "I told you so."

And yes, an echo chamber is exactly what we created here, and we want to keep it that way. this is a safe space for Q followers, because we are tired of all the hostility from people like you. This is pretty much the only space we have where we don't have to worry about that. You are not welcome. Deported.

9
bgny 9 points ago +9 / -0

This drop came to mind after I saw that 2000 National Guard and 700 marines were deployed to CA.

19
bgny 19 points ago +22 / -3

Truth can shine through any tool, even a donkey once spoke when God willed it. It’s not about trusting AI, it’s about seeking truth wherever it’s found. If God can use a rock to cry out, He can use tech too.

I'll also post whatever I like and there's nothing you can do about it.

13
bgny 13 points ago +13 / -0

I wouldn’t say the explanation is off the mark, but rather, it's grounded in a long-standing Christian view that the cross wasn’t just a reaction to rejection- it was God's redemptive plan from the beginning. Jesus didn’t go to the cross reluctantly, He chose it, knowing what it would accomplish. The cross wasn’t the result of failure, it was the means of victory.

11
bgny 11 points ago +13 / -2

Good for you. Fact check it then.

A tool is only as dangerous or divine as the hands that wield it. Technology can help to spread darkness or light. The choice is ours.

2
bgny 2 points ago +3 / -1

After the release of the files (same day though). My thoughts are that Alex MAY have been compromised at one time, mostly because of what Q implied. BUT the way the deep state went after him and tried to shut him down - putting him through the court gauntlet and forcing him to file for bankruptcy, is evidence that he broke free or at least attempted too.

9
bgny 9 points ago +9 / -0

Do you really think that we would all think he meant D voters don't exist at all, and then actually believe that to be true? Lol. Why don't you try contributing something to this site besides your annoying smart boy comments. I also don't care what you think is a bad idea, since you are not very smart.

5
bgny 5 points ago +5 / -0

Q posts on 8kun.top but you can use this aggregator for an easy check for new drops: https://qalerts.app/

3
bgny 3 points ago +3 / -0

If you are a reader Dave Hayes wrote the Q Chronicles. There's four books in the series so far and you can find them on Amazon.

11
bgny 11 points ago +11 / -0

In the video of the attack (discretion advised) you can see the attacker actually check the switchblade when he realizes it did not open after striking several times.

view more: Next ›