This is the best post I've seen in awhile. I didn't trust them for exactly the reasons you listed. Every time Q has gone silent we've had some fake person or entity filling the void and preying on those who want to believe. Thank you for the research points to look into them. While I have no problem with a site making money with good info it mostly seems to be parroting alot of our catch phrases. I'm not sure they've given good info even with the photos. Someone has some level of access to trump but that doesn't mean we just trust them. Q had to build that rapport over a year with proofs. George hasn't done that with coordinating Trump communications. So yeah suspicious and worth looking into more.
I think we also need to stop lining up Q posts with comms from Pompeo and Dan as well. They may have inside knowledge and may be communicating with us as allies in the info war but the Q posts were to be proofed against Trump posts not Pompeo or Dan. Q never hinted other accounts should point us to drops. I could be wrong on this but it doesn't feel right. Just my gut after 4 years of this drama.
Note: Alot of good replies below...I've always felt real paytriots would require you to buy into their merch or platform before you could view the content. George isn't doing that. However I also haven't seen anything of use to us in this war coming from them and have to wonder who they are before they have my trust. To those saying trump hasn't denounced them...well George may not even be on their radar to denounce. It may not be big enough of a nuisance to them yet.
Question: if George news is setting up to be Pres. Trump 's news platform why would they set up a new system that is building off of lefty platforms? Trump had the money to do it right without potential outside interference from the commies. He would do it right from the start in my opinion.
FWIW, assuming George IS legit, during the discussion about outside comms and legitimate decoding, etc, he said that THEY pay close attention to posts from Dan, Kansas, and Flynn. Also said that Flynn has a nickname: Captain America. Anyone heard that before? And Trump is Mogul (his SS nickname) as well as Maestro. These little insider details appear to be dropped effortlessly (not like a LARP trying to invent something), and would theoretically be easily debunked by others close to these people. GeorgeNews is getting a big enough following by this point that if they seriously are LARPs, people in the know would be disavowing them.
This appears, at least to me, to be a serious attempt to discredit Q. As many have stated, they've had gut feelings about George, but they haven't been able to say why. I believe the explanation here with the links is enough to say I'm not going to invest time in George.
But this brings up a question about "no outside comms," and this is a real question. I'm not dooming. I'm really trying to go with the information given and look further into other "outside comms" and if they are not considered outside comms and why. If there are no outside comms, why are the Twitter posts of Pompeo, Scavino, and Don, Jr., examined for their ties to Q posts? If there are no outside comms, maybe we should be looking only for events (which is a little difficult since we have such censorship)? Again, this is a question based on what seems logical thinking to me. Does anyone have information where it was said we should pay attention to these posts? I'm always a little critical of the jump on Pompeo's Sunday morning tweets. I think the man is a Christian and simply sharing his faith on Sunday with scripture, and everyone is trying to turn everything into a reason to search the Q posts.
This is the best post I've seen in awhile. I didn't trust them for exactly the reasons you listed. Every time Q has gone silent we've had some fake person or entity filling the void and preying on those who want to believe. Thank you for the research points to look into them. While I have no problem with a site making money with good info it mostly seems to be parroting alot of our catch phrases. I'm not sure they've given good info even with the photos. Someone has some level of access to trump but that doesn't mean we just trust them. Q had to build that rapport over a year with proofs. George hasn't done that with coordinating Trump communications. So yeah suspicious and worth looking into more.
I think we also need to stop lining up Q posts with comms from Pompeo and Dan as well. They may have inside knowledge and may be communicating with us as allies in the info war but the Q posts were to be proofed against Trump posts not Pompeo or Dan. Q never hinted other accounts should point us to drops. I could be wrong on this but it doesn't feel right. Just my gut after 4 years of this drama.
Note: Alot of good replies below...I've always felt real paytriots would require you to buy into their merch or platform before you could view the content. George isn't doing that. However I also haven't seen anything of use to us in this war coming from them and have to wonder who they are before they have my trust. To those saying trump hasn't denounced them...well George may not even be on their radar to denounce. It may not be big enough of a nuisance to them yet.
Question: if George news is setting up to be Pres. Trump 's news platform why would they set up a new system that is building off of lefty platforms? Trump had the money to do it right without potential outside interference from the commies. He would do it right from the start in my opinion.
FWIW, assuming George IS legit, during the discussion about outside comms and legitimate decoding, etc, he said that THEY pay close attention to posts from Dan, Kansas, and Flynn. Also said that Flynn has a nickname: Captain America. Anyone heard that before? And Trump is Mogul (his SS nickname) as well as Maestro. These little insider details appear to be dropped effortlessly (not like a LARP trying to invent something), and would theoretically be easily debunked by others close to these people. GeorgeNews is getting a big enough following by this point that if they seriously are LARPs, people in the know would be disavowing them.
Maybe it's a point we shod directly ask trump to address whether they stand behind this organization.
Serial Brain always referred to President Trump as Maestro. That’s the only place I remember hearing that title.
This appears, at least to me, to be a serious attempt to discredit Q. As many have stated, they've had gut feelings about George, but they haven't been able to say why. I believe the explanation here with the links is enough to say I'm not going to invest time in George.
But this brings up a question about "no outside comms," and this is a real question. I'm not dooming. I'm really trying to go with the information given and look further into other "outside comms" and if they are not considered outside comms and why. If there are no outside comms, why are the Twitter posts of Pompeo, Scavino, and Don, Jr., examined for their ties to Q posts? If there are no outside comms, maybe we should be looking only for events (which is a little difficult since we have such censorship)? Again, this is a question based on what seems logical thinking to me. Does anyone have information where it was said we should pay attention to these posts? I'm always a little critical of the jump on Pompeo's Sunday morning tweets. I think the man is a Christian and simply sharing his faith on Sunday with scripture, and everyone is trying to turn everything into a reason to search the Q posts.
Really hoping to find the answer to this one.