But right now I think we have to be extra careful of the controlled opposition angle.
Newsmax was pretty obvious, at least to me, but I was really thinking GEORGE was 100% legit. I'm embarrassed to admit that, simply from a place of personal trust. Everyone should be extra cautious of good news right now.
We need to take a step back and be cautious of everyone. I and others were willing to take GEORGE at face value and not give them due diligence. We need to make sure things are legitimate, even Q. In our desperation is when we are the weakest to these sorts of attacks.
GEORGE may still be legit, but they have a long way to proving themselves and it might require a nod from Trump to do it. He nodded to Q many times; pointing at people wearing Q and 17 shirts. GEORGE has had no such call-out yet. Which means they are an operation by the good guys or they are controlled opposition.
Since Trump had nodded in the past to Q, do you think we need to go back and watch his public speakings since his last Q post to see if there's any nods? Or perhaps starting from Jan 20th? Maybe he's made a nod to something in one of his speeches (CPAC)? Or perhaps even something to denounce GEORGE?
I think there is a fakeness to all this anti george stuff. As Shakespeare wrote. “methinks thou dost protest too much.” What if our side had used a short cut, and missy embarrassed them? All this because they used video from a another site. What if it is the same photographer?
Attack Wapo, the Times, Newsweek, etc., all the leftists media that is fit to hate.
Don't get me wrong, I wanted them to be real.
But right now I think we have to be extra careful of the controlled opposition angle.
Newsmax was pretty obvious, at least to me, but I was really thinking GEORGE was 100% legit. I'm embarrassed to admit that, simply from a place of personal trust. Everyone should be extra cautious of good news right now.
We need to take a step back and be cautious of everyone. I and others were willing to take GEORGE at face value and not give them due diligence. We need to make sure things are legitimate, even Q. In our desperation is when we are the weakest to these sorts of attacks.
GEORGE may still be legit, but they have a long way to proving themselves and it might require a nod from Trump to do it. He nodded to Q many times; pointing at people wearing Q and 17 shirts. GEORGE has had no such call-out yet. Which means they are an operation by the good guys or they are controlled opposition.
Stay frosty.
Since Trump had nodded in the past to Q, do you think we need to go back and watch his public speakings since his last Q post to see if there's any nods? Or perhaps starting from Jan 20th? Maybe he's made a nod to something in one of his speeches (CPAC)? Or perhaps even something to denounce GEORGE?
Im now wondering if the entire platform is shady.
What platform?
Telegram
I think there is a fakeness to all this anti george stuff. As Shakespeare wrote. “methinks thou dost protest too much.” What if our side had used a short cut, and missy embarrassed them? All this because they used video from a another site. What if it is the same photographer?
Attack Wapo, the Times, Newsweek, etc., all the leftists media that is fit to hate.