Actually no. Most of us previously supported George News and were swayed by the logical arguments presented. The most persuasive one.wss the thoroughly unnecessary, initial banning of a poster for asking a legitimate question about the providence of a video that was used. I didn't see anyone at GAW jump on board without reading through the comments. Might have happened, but I would say that was an exception rather than the rule. In fact, what I saw were a bunch of people very disappointed that the evidence indicates George News is likely false.