Actually no. Most of us previously supported George News and were swayed by the logical arguments presented. The most persuasive one.wss the thoroughly unnecessary, initial banning of a poster for asking a legitimate question about the providence of a video that was used. I didn't see anyone at GAW jump on board without reading through the comments. Might have happened, but I would say that was an exception rather than the rule. In fact, what I saw were a bunch of people very disappointed that the evidence indicates George News is likely false.
Sorry to report this was a nothingburger.
Look at the ATIS report from Reagan National. All night long they were reporting: light snow, freezing fog, light rain, and mist. If it were smoke, they would be reporting smoke. The FAA doesn't lie about things like this. There is too much liability.
So no. It was almost certainly not smoke from tunnels. It was a normal surface weather phenomenon. People are just so starved for action they are making stuff up trying to prove that something is going on.
Agreed. What you say is the most likely scenario, and that they are simply allowing statements to be recorded for posterity. However, it does leave open the possibility that they can later claim the information presented was so compelling that they are changing their mind and now ready to take up the case.
In this case though, because the right decision is already so obvious, I doubt that anything will change their minds. But from an optics standpoint they could reverse their decision at a later date if the circumstances dictate it. So it does leave open a possible path that team Human Patriot might force upon the lizards later once team Reptilian Pedophile is defeated. This might be more preferable to the population than an outright military coup.
Because it is a ruling that is less than a complete acceptance of the case. Even though a Writ of Certiorari would not provide much information, it is the standard for accepting a case onto the docket. What SCOTUS has done is something in between saying yes and saying no. It actually makes sense for a group of justices who are equivocating, not sure which way the wind is blowing.
Hmmm....
I found the "EXACTLY 9:44:54" strange. Very unusual for Q to worry about seconds. What immediately came to mind is drop 944 and drop 954. Which read as follows:
944
We went too deep. Attempted a pullback. Not ready. Q
954
Next week. BOOM. BOOM. BOOM. Q
So maybe implying a delay until next week? Just a guess. Would match with the "dark and exhausted" motif in the photo.
No shortage of silver shot here in Bangkok.
Whatever shortages that exist must be temporary and as a result of an unexpected burst of physical purchases. Either that or he is talking about huge amounts that simply strain the supply chain. Given that this would appear to be a highly geographically localized phenomenon, I would expect it will be sorted in a few weeks as the major vendors shift supply around the globe.
As an opportunity, I am not sure if that creates a window for anyone in the states with physical silver to take advantage of or not. I suppose it depends on how much people are willing to pay for immediate delivery vs. waiting. If you are sitting on physical silver and looking for an exit point this is something you may wish to consider.
Silver isn't used as a monetary metal in SE Asia. There is no resale market to speak of. It is basically just an industrial metal for jewelry. Does make me wonder if I should go pick up a couple of kg bags of shot just in case though.
Precisely. Explain to me what was accomplished by this entire charade? Nobody aside from those on this board even watched these proceedings. Is there anything materially different now vs. 5 days ago? Nobody "woke up" as a result of this. Where are the booms we were hoping for? Very few who aren't on this board even watched these proceedings.
I just can't figure out the point of all of this. It simply defies logic. Am I supposed to believe this whole movie is simply designed to confuse the audience? Who wants to watch a movie like that...
Good to know. Just understand that as an American who has lived in SE Asia for a long time, including through multiple military coups, I can guarantee you that the reaction of the locals to a coup has no bearing on how Americans would perceive a similar situation. A large contingent in that crowd are likely being paid to protest. Not all by any means, but a large percentage. And much like the in the USA, where you can believe Biden genuinely has the support of 80 million people if it aligns with your views, she can believe the Chinese are responsible if she wants.
In any case, their reactions can not be used as a basis for how an average American would react. The cultures are just too different. It is possible someone is looking at how international governments might treat the issue, but the locals are not relevant to that scene. She also apparently makes protest signs, so has a financial incentive to spin the narrative. That shouldn't be ignored.
What I can tell you is she is either confused or intentionally misleading you about the Chinese supporting the Burmese military. They are quite happy with the NLD government as it stands. That sounds like a rumor the NLD started to try and whip their supporters into a frenzy and distract from the real truth behind the coup.
All that said, I am not in Myanmar, so I have only a rudimentary understanding of the situation. But I understand the Chinese intentions in this part of the world pretty well. They didn't support this coup.
So update based on actual events:
Rather than that long post above, all that would have been required is a simple statement like:
*Just wait to see what these idiots will agree to *
Who could have possibly guessed these morons would be so stupid as to allow for witnesses to be called under oath. Gee...what do you think Nancy Pelosi is going to do when they start asking her incriminating questions under oath about what was found on her laptop?
Do you think she might lie, for example? That's not a criminal offense, is it?
It's not that I doubt Q has a plan, it is just that the editor of this movie is doing a piss poor job of keeping the audience engaged. Too many people are walking out because it seems to be made by an amateur film student...
Well, this was certainly unexpected. I didn't actually think they would agree to calling witnesses during this farce. Why would they want that? I would think the Democrats would want this over as quickly as possible. A quick illegal conviction and then move on.
Perhaps there is more to this strategy than I thought. This whole thing just defies logic. I am genuinely tired of trying to apply rational analysis to this spectacle. It makes no logical sense. My brain hurts....
Bring 'em on then.
Maybe this is when we finally get to see the booms...
The only way what you say is true is if you assume that Q was defeated. Basically that the deep state plan was superior to Q's, and Q got crushed. This is certainly possible, but you state this with a certainty I don't think is warranted. Not yet anyway.
If this continues on beyond March into April, then even I may start to agree with you. For now though, I am inclined to believe that something has happened which is causing Trump to hold on giving the "go ahead" signal.
I'm willing to wait a short while longer to see if they can correct whatever is going sideways. This is a complicated scenario after all. A lot has been invested. Projects of this size often go over time and over budget. I'm sure it won't be abandoned unless there is a serious flaw.
The problem is this would be against the law, because it would allow someone to engage in vote buying. If you can prove your vote, then a bad actor could also demand that same proof in order to decide whether to pay out or not.
The game is rigged so that you have to assume the voting machines are trustworthy. If you can prove they are untrustworthy, then that same mechanism can be used for illicit purposes.
This is why a completely new blockchain technology is the only answer if you want to continue with electronic voting.
Regardless of the outcome of the impeachment, there is still SCOTUS cases coming up, and I dont think military will do anything until those are resolved.
Resolved? So you are saying there will be no action by the military until after October at the earliest? Because even if SCOTUS elects to accept the cases this month, they won't be docketed for a full hearing until at least October.
If what you say is true, I think people will mostly have abandoned the Q movement long before the military does anything.
I would suggest that if true, whoever you are speaking with is in the minority. Yes, in the rural areas, they still would use paper ballots. Electronic voting would be reserved only for the wealthier metropolitan areas.
However, China does not actually trust the Burmese military. There is a long history there, and the Burmese military are too unpredictable. By contrast, the CCP has a very good relationship with the NLD run government, and have given them tons of money. They are a critical part of the Belt and Roads initiative. They are building a deep sea port primarily with Chinese funds. Follow the money. China has a very big incentive to maintain the government of "the lady" and her NLD party.
No, the Chinese are not behind the military coup in Myanmar. That is most likely intentional disinformation begun by the NLD themselves, or simply confusion by someone who doesn't see the larger picture. Is the person you spoke with actually living in Myanmar today? Or someone who left Myanmar a decade ago and may be speaking about old biases? How do you know they aren't an NLD propaganda agent?
There is almost nobody left to "wake up". If what you say is true you have long passed the point of diminishing returns. Cut the movie short. There are only 3 types of people left:
- Those of us here
- Those who believe facts are irrelevant and the elite can not be stopped. They know it is a lie but just do whatever the MSM says in order to avoid conflict
- Those who have been captured by the globalist cabal and can not be deprogrammed in the current environment
There is almost nobody outside of these 3 groups.
So stop saying "wake up". Everyone in groups 1&2 is already awake. We know they are evil. And group 3 is in a coma. Put an end to this movie and take action. Any further of this movie stuff and you just look like a sadistic asshat trying to enjoy a horror film of your own creation.
Is there is a genuine reason why the plan is failing and you can't move forward? If so, give us an update. Otherwise, since you appear to believe you are part of the production crew, please report this reality back to the director. If any of what you say is true, you need to hire a much better editing staff...
More talk, more videos, more memes...none of that is helpful any longer.
People don't believe the mainstream media, but they look to it in order to guide them on what is acceptable speech.
One thing that scandal after scandal such as 9/11 and Sandy Hook did is convince people that facts don't actually matter. Trying to defend what is true just gets you mocked and ridiculed. The optimal strategy is just keep your head down and accept the elite are above the law and can do whatever they want. The mainstream media will guide you on how to avoid conflict.
Only action can help now. We need that first arrest that is going to shock the world. And if that isn't going to happen, we need to take action ourselves. Whether old fashioned revolution like the left employs, or else large secession movements that actually have a chance to succeed. When the Soviet Union broke up it was a fait acompli in a matter of weeks. The same would be true of the USA if a genuine movement were to begin. It could happen at any moment. The country is ripe.
Q's digital army has outlived its usefulness. People need evidence now that the elite can be overthrown. By far the largest contingent of friends and family I have are in the above group. Time to either sh!t or get off the pot.
It's not what any of us want to hear, but it is the truth. We are withering on the vine.
Evidence will not be presented to SCOTUS next week. Next week they will simply decide whether to proceed to a full hearing of the case, which will be docketed for some time in October at the earliest. Whatever reason they had for not using this opportunity to present evidence of election fraud and FISAGate, it has nothing to do with SCOTUS.
I remember this story from over a decade ago. It was widely reported by the news services here. Apparently a perfectly preserved, late term fetus in encrusted in gold leaf can sell for up to $1 million USD in China. Most Thais, even Thai Chinese, find the practice revolting, but there are always those willing to do anything for luck. They also like to eat tiger penises and other odd things. Superstition is strong in this part of the world.
In the case referred to here, if memory serves, there was no indication any child was ever murdered. As I remember, police determined the fetuses were obtained from a hospital where nurses had sold the remains obtained from miscarriages.
It also turns out that the only crime actually committed was illegal disposal and transporting of human remains...a charge which carried a penalty of only 2000 baht, which is around $60 - $70 USD. With such a large payoff and such a tiny fine if you get caught, I assume that people are still involved in the practice.
The only saving grace is that there is a very small market for such things. It is not something that could ever be done in scale. It takes a particular kind of sick to think this brings luck.