@Evspra - Are people posting links to GeorgeNews against the rules? I don't, and I'm sure most others would agree, need someone filtering content for me (content as it relates to analysis and discussion of GeorgeNews posts).
If GeorgeNews doesn't provide any type of equity it will naturally remove itself from the discussion on GAW.
What I don't get is that George has never come and make a claim like "Hey, we're Q." They've been cheerleaders for DJT and have alluded to Q like many others have.
This smells like a controlled oppo op to sow dissent and discord amongst the base.
You might be right. GAW is one of the last bastions of free thought left. To think it would split over some paytriot allegations is stupid, and makes me angry.
George might not be the perfectly austere monk that everyone wants them to be, but they've been giving us good info that we otherwise would have overlooked. They've been cheering us on in a way that paytriots would not.
And it seems like you can't ever prove, in the Alinskyite fashion, that George is legit.
It's disturbing that this was done overnight -- reminds me of the election theft itself.
It was instigated by one person who says, "Go check yourself" while simultaneously declaring "IT's FAKE!"
And suddenly all these anti-George threads have proliferated.
I'm trying to stay neutral in this and watch but it doesn't look good either way.