If they did that I wouldn't defend them at all, and attack them back and abandon them as you would hope I would do so. Don't go putting words in my mouth.

You assume too much about what we think here. I raise that counterpoint because I thought you might not have considered it. We're quite capable of coming to our own conclusions without you intervening like we're children in a nursery, and frankly we're not happy with you declaring you know what's best for us.

But you decided you'll deny this counterpoint of mine and come to your own conclusion, and decide that you won't be replying on the basis that perhaps we won't ever find middle ground on this topic. I don't think that way but I don't ever get to decide whether you'll agree with me or not, just as you don't get to decide that for me.

Right now, I see that you are ruling this site with an iron fist. Defy your stance on George and we get the ban hammer. Call you out for being a heavy-handed mod and we get the ban hammer. You have no idea what you are doing, because you've let your authority as Mod and Site Dev go to your head.

I will not challenge you to ban me, because that'd be foolish, but think for a second about the consequences of your words and actions. Did you challenge George properly? How did you word your message to them in the first place? What exactly would cause them to ban you from their telegram: The question? The link? The fact that they implemented a bot? Did you accuse them of paytriotism? Share that message with us.

Right now you are pitting George supporters against George haters on this last bastion of Free Thought. We don't need this conflict. We don't need this censorship. We need to hold the line. We need to share information, Q-related of course, and George has been talking about Q. We need to keep hope, and George has been giving us hope. And that merch and donations? Let buyers buy and donors donate. That's not our concern, and we don't need to be protected from that. It's our choice what we do with our dollars.