You are correct the images I took for the military were not my property as a combat camera soldier. As I understood at the time it was our goal to have them posted to divids to be put out into the world and the media. I only had a few make it past classification and the public affairs officers to release it to divids hub. One made it to a washington post article, which I thought was pretty cool because they gave me photo credit. It's a good question if a news site sole contributions are that of Com Cam should be making money.
You are correct the images I took for the military were not my property as a combat camera soldier. As I understood at the time it was our goal to have them posted to divids to be put out into the world and the media. I only had a few make it past classification and the public affairs officers to release it to divids hub. One made it to a washington post article, which I thought was pretty cool because they gave me photo credit. It's a good question if a news site sole contributions are that of Com Cam should be making money.
Thank you. As a photog you have more specific knowledge of the subject than I do.