Banning anything is going against our common cause!!!
You banning GEORGENEWS is a big mistake! You have just broken the number one rule we all unite on!
Fix this before me and many people I know decide to leave, you can’t censor free speech!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Evspra was the first to get banned and he never linked a single thing. Did you even read his stickied posts this morning?
Yep. I did. First...i didn't say she linked anything. Nor did I say that was the main/one thing Evspra was banned for. I am saying that what ever parameters they have for the bit may be why she was banned. Like, if the div... site that the pulled video from was read by the bit as a website then maybe that literally is why she was banned.
My main point is they have a bot that was set with certain parameters to ban. GA has certain parameters when people can/t post. It is the same to me considering that shills and deep-staters abound EVERYWHERE and if think it may lend to some measure of paranoia or assumed illintent.
People drop the shill label as liberally as liberals drop an *ism label. And to me, both are counter productive to Free speech.
GN isn't pushing anything that, if it were just a person posting here, that would violate GA rules...so why ban them?
Sorry but I saw too many people banned for simply asking for information. Sounds like you've got some double standards.
Literally any post that calls george out as fake gets banned.
Think about that.
What are you saying is my double standard?
That george banning somehow gets a pass. If what you say is true, we won't see it happen much more, right? Oh but for now comments are disabled on their telegram. When it's back up, maybe we should test that theory.
Ah. Ok thank you for clarifying.
Yes, I agree with seeing what happens when comments are back.
But, there still isn't a double standard. GN isn't banning links to an entire website (Al biet part of the dispute is whether they did for new accounts because of possible spam.) I take objection to GA banning any links from GN. Like mentioned before how do you justify banning links to GN but not CNN who outright hates us? If I commented on CNN a link that is critical of them, theyd prolly delete and ban me....or Twitter...they ban us all day everyday.........but links to Twitter aren't banned.
So, no, the double standard is on GA's side.
Further clarity will, of course, be gained after comments return. But regardless even if GN bans individuals....just like GA does....I don't think it is right for GA to ban links from GN fir the reasons given if they don't apply it to other sites that ban individuals' posts.
No, I don't think it is right for GN to ban critical posts (if that is what happened) - I just don't see what that has to do with banning all users of GA from referring to ANY information GN puts out as if it is anymore dangerous than MSM.
Wow. A downvoted cuz I asked for clarity. How petty are folks on this site are becoming.