Whatever this board is, it's no Voat. Moderators acting like big tech, deciding what you can and cannot discuss...wake up before you turn into the libtards you despise.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (126)
sorted by:
For a site that's about researching Q and questioning everything around you, it sure feels like you can't disagree with a lot of things.
Maybe George isn't legit, or maybe they can find a way to prove that they are indeed credible. Whether they are legit or not I don't think the mob mentality against George is good for what GAW is supposed to be, which is a Q research board. This sort of mentality could be used against us by outside parties.
It paints a bad picture, tomorrow someone like Mike Lindell or hell, even Trump himself could be ousted by GAW because a mod said they're "paytriots."
That's my two cents at least.
Have you read the mountains of evidence compiled against George?
A lot of people have been skeptical since day 1. They were silenced by George dick suckers calling them shills or doomers.
Now that the dam has finally burst, people are coming out against it again to reinforce that it was bullshit, the same way they did with Simon Parks and all that other nonsense.
I have, they do seem guilty. What I'm saying is that we should maybe give them the benefit of the doubt and a chance to redeem themselves. Maybe they can show proof that they are legit instead of immediately attacking them.
If you look closer, they did give them the benefit of the doubt. The first concerns were raised last night. Since then, they've had multiple opportunities to address them. Instead, they respond by banning people and disabling communications.
Nobody is stopping you from posting a defense of George news. What I read indicates the mods won't ban that; what they're purging is links not related to the discussion of George's veracity (in other words, posts assuming it is valid, or promoting it as valid [as in spam] without providing proof).
And now GAW is banning people for talking about it. Ironic, isnt it.
I noticed some Gn posts here over the past weeks (months). Very quickly, all the "look! Posting from this location" crud had the distinct vibration of larpism and exploitation.
"you are not abandoned" etc, and then being treated as if some source of legit or inside info? No thanks.
Nothing wrong with posting encouragement and supporting each other, but the smell coming of George News hit my nostrils pretty quick, and for that reason, I quickly turned off and paid no attention aside from asking myself "Why are people giving this the attention they are???? Sheesh"
PS. Liking your comments in this thread, Jud.
tips hat
Thanks bud, doin' what I can with my two cents.
Express your concerns and your discoveries, let the people decide if they agree. if they don't find more proof. if they still disagree reevaluate your position and decide for yourself to avoid George. AMERICA