So... just on GeorgeNews....
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Many people did get banned today, whatever the explanation, but many others did NOT, and George answered this question at LEAST 3 times in the comments. THEY WORK WITH THE DVIDS team and therefore have access/permission to use the material. THEY ARE NOT STEALING CONTENT that they created in cooperation with another military group. Now, could they be lying--sure, I guess. But it IS NOT TRUE OR FAIR to say they just instabanned EVERYONE and never answered the question. If they ARE military credentialed photographers/communications people, then it is perfectly logical that they would potentially work with other teams. They said in the live chat tonight that they do not generally name individuals who are working with them because some have been doxxed. I can accept that. They've posted pictures of their credentials/passes, emails, itineraries, etc, in the past, some of which were posted this morning in response to questions raised here about verifying their legitimacy. They have also said they are currently working on a documentary (and a coffee table book). If they're LARPs, this claim will out them eventually, and if they are legit, this will eventually help to vindicate them.
Seriously, if they are claiming to work this closely with the president and posting so many pictures, videos, etc that supposedly support the claim, but they are LARPing--it won't need us to bring them down. The entities they claim to represent will eventually chew them up and spit them out. If they're LARPing, they've gone all-in, and if they're paytriots (focus is the money, not the movement/information), they've sure got the disinfo psyop going on with those "WE WILL NEVER ASK FOR DONATIONS" statements they've put out. Yes, there are still concerns and questions to be answered about George, but it's not fair to say they banned EVERYONE and answered NO questions. We may not consider the answer to be convincing enough or well-enough supported, and we may have still more issues to discuss, but it's just not the truth that they banned and ignored everyone who asked for confirmation.