It's actually nuts. The logical hoops you have to jump through to use George banning users as some sort of proof while simultaneously banning users at the drop of a hat on GA. It's quite the double standard. Or maybe we should just concur that GA is no longer trustworthy because it is banning users... I mean that is the premise we're building the case upon right?
It's actually nuts. The logical hoops you have to jump through to use George banning users as some sort of proof while simultaneously banning users at the drop of a hat on GA. It's quite the double standard. Or maybe we should just concur that GA is no longer trustworthy because it is banning users... I mean that is the premise we're building the case upon right?