It's actually nuts. The logical hoops you have to jump through to use George banning users as some sort of proof while simultaneously banning users at the drop of a hat on GA. It's quite the double standard. Or maybe we should just concur that GA is no longer trustworthy because it is banning users... I mean that is the premise we're building the case upon right?
The logo of george.news below the newsletter links to https://dfns.tv which is shorthand for Defensetv.org ? Its build on top of the same platform paper.li, coincidence?
I’m a little confused. Why are we banning George news? Can’t we make up our minds about them ourselves. Joe Biden could be fake and yet people still post every stupid thing he says or does.
What if we’re all looking at this the wrong way? Many of us are desperate for hope and are looking for, well, anything Q related. But what if GEORGE NEWS is just simply a patriot with White House credentials sharing pics, videos, and some thoughts. Maybe it was never intended to be anything more than that? Did we all just assume that because of the name and inside access that this was somehow the Q team or somehow related? Maybe it was just meant to be a fun patriotic site.
Not saying I’m right here. Just as confused as some others and trying to look at it neutrally.
I hate censorship but you aren't blocked from visiting them on your own time.
They are just blocked from being re-posted here every 5 minutes by people that don't know how the internet works.
And the day George drops anything resembling useful new information I'm sure it will be posted here... generally in 10 identical posts all at the same time. Most of them just a screenshot with no link... but I digress.
The smoking gun proof these guys had was that they went into Georgechat and got banned
No. The smoking gun was their continued use of publicly available videos from dvidshub.net and using those videos to suggest to morons that don't investigate anything, that George was an 'insider.
The smoking gun was their continued use of publicly available photos from well known DC photographer Brendan Smialowski to suggest that they had the kind of access to Trump that Smialowski had. Photos from Getty Images.
Now you tell me those pictures weren't taken by the same person in quick succession. I bet Smialowski has more than a dozen photos, taken in a rapid succession of this.
I would like to know why said admin was relying on others to tell him what Georgenews was saying via telegram? Does he not have telegram and had he not been following Georgenews for the past few months on telegram? At least last few weeks maybe!?
I do and have and in all honesty, George news hasn't posted anything unique or anything that would suggest that are an 'insider'.
But I can guarantee you that he did not verify every single one of Georgenews photos posted in the past year on telegram
Did you? Did you verify every single one of them to prove they are unique?
How come you put the burden of proof on the doubters but not on the 'believers' or George news itself?
It says Georgenews shared a forwarded message from DJT jr. Does that not mean the same thing like email?
Do you not know how Telegram works? Look at a post from another user and at the bottom right of the post will be an arrow. Click on it and you can 'forward the post' of anyone. I could go on Telegram right now and forward a post from DJT Jr. to my followers.
Georgenews in April photograph has collectiveQ in the photo text. Not taken down.
holy shit, lol. I can't believe you're using this as evidence. Do you not realize that literally ANYONE can get a photo, go into Microsoft Paint, type some text on the photo, and then save it? Do you have a deed to the Brooklyn Bridge in your filing cabinet by any chance?
Why would George news sign up, Test run in January with a pro trump quote, make virtually 0 posts until Nov 9 (trust the plan,photos) and then only after trump is out of office and everything is shot he thinks it’s the best time to make money?
Because A LOT of people believe the election was stolen and, even if they're not an Anons, are looking for some sort of hope that justice will be done, the fraud will be revealed, and the guilty will be punished.
For Hopium Addicts, George news is holding out the pipe, supplying an endless amount of hopium, and lighting it up for all to smoke.
While Trump was in office, George news didn't matter. People had access to Trump on Twitter. From the White House website. Through people in his administration (Scavino, etc.).
With Trump out and being virtually invisible, and also being banned from Twitter, FB, etc. and the MSM not doing any stories on him, people are looking for some source, whether it's true or not. George filled that void. I would argue that it's the PERFECT time for them to make money. Who are they competing against for news on Trump right now? Pretty much no one.
And the smoking gun proof GAW hack team had was - getting banned!!
Well, it doesn't make George's case look good. All they would have to do is address the questions about the videos they use being coincidentally publicly available on dvidshub and the photos they use being available on Getty images.
So instead of a simple explanation to alleviate any doubts, they ban people who raise legitimate questions. If that doesn't raise even more questions, you may not be using your brain properly.
Every concern you raised can easily be debunked.
Be more discerning. Q taught us to question everything, said no outside comms, and the minute Trump leaves office and there is a distinct lack of Trump news, you toss out everything Q taught you and fall in love with the first entity to sugar-dick you with publicly available information.
He brings up good points. None of your arguments are bombshell proof. You’ve been immature towards everyone trying to tell you that you’re going down the wrong path. Your ego keeps getting in the way for you to realize that maybe you were wrong and jumped the gun too quickly. You made some wrong assumptions and spiraled down a bad dig. I’ve read through all of the proof threads and they basically just explain how marketing sites operate and make connections off of not understanding building a web platform.
I’m not saying this with I’ll intent. I just wish you would put your ego aside to consider that you were wrong.
Yea i dont know what mlre u meed than THEY BLOCKED EVERY SINGKE PERSON THAT ASKED A SIMPLE FUCKIN QUESTION?!!!! If u wanna get raped by georgenews go ahead u fuckin tards
See, I’m disagreeing and you’re coming at me hot. The way you’re responding to me is part of the problem and what we should be against..
I bet most of the people that went to GN after getting fired up also went in hot. I can see why they banned people when a bunch of hyped up kids started saying the same thing.
They also have a filter bot in their channel to prevent spam.
I will admit I fell for George news. I was pretty upset and angry yesterday. I will say that after reading through all of your thread and doing some of my own research that I tend to agree with you. Unfortunately, they aren’t as credible as some may have thought. I, however, do not agree with you for banning their links. It is creating bitterness and a divide amongst us here. Please allow users to post what they would like. George news will eventually fizzle out and we will all move on as we have from other previous LARPs. I know there is a lot of pressure here, but I truly believe this is the best route.
I'm a software engineer / ux designer / graphic designer. I've worked in marketing before. This is what news organizations and publications do.. they pull content from stock sites.
Nothing they have posted is stolen. Have you gone through their faq?
"Information presented on or via DVIDS is considered public information and may be distributed or copied unless otherwise specified"
"DVIDS receives content from many branches and offices of the DoD and U.S. Federal Government. In general, all content on DVIDS is in the Public Domain."
Your argument might end up being that they presented the information as their own. What we're saying is.. is ALL of their content from stock sites? It doesn't seem like it and there's nothing to show that's true.
I don't have strong feelings one way or the other about George News, but I do have a strong feeling that people are taking sides, and things are becoming divisive on the forum. No one had a problem with the receipts provided in the moderator's post, but when someone becomes dictator and tries to be the thought-police because others have a differing opinion, that creates an issue on a forum where free thought and speech should be lauded. I mean, we can go to Twitter or FB to be banned.
I asked pertinent questions yesterday about the meaning of outside comms. I never received an answer. For example, what makes George News an outside comm, but Pompeo, Scavino, et al, tweets are not considered outside comms? Legitimate question with no intent to doom. People are scouring the boards and sharing connections.
I do think the problem is not that the moderator has a problem with George News and that he laid out his reasons with receipts. The problem is that the moderator expects everyone to believe as he believes, to accept his receipts or be damned, but this is a forum in which those like the commentator of this thread have done equal research and come to a different conclusion. That is freedom of thought transformed into freedom of speech. It's opposition to the moderator but it is also open debate which by the act of banning has turned it into a free-for-all with people taking sides, which is not what this forum is meant to do.
The irony of being banned for giving an opinion that opposes a moderator's opinion should not be lost on anyone. The moderator opened a can of worms that may not be resolved until the moderator can tuck the pride inside and realize that freedom of thought and speech are not his to moderate.
Again, I don't hold an opinion on George News. I generally see it through the lens of others who are watching and provide analysis of certain topics. Are they comms or just good information? To me, that's a question worthy of Pompeo and Scavino tweets as well. But no one's going to get banned for announcing that Pompeo tweeted Scripture on Sunday and relating it to Q. But God forbid, someone try to do the same with George News.
Not a good call at all. People are tired of what is happening to them in reality. The general population on this board have had an election stolen from them, have seen injustices continue, are rightfully upset by the fact that a virus has been used to call many into submission, and they come here for answers only to find out that this board is no better than FB or Twitter.
George news is fake bro. They are stealing videos from other sources and then putting their gay logo over them, claiming to be original videos.
Are you saying the other site is stealing GeorgeNews videos/pics?
Forget about dates/times for a second and think about the George watermark that they put on every single thing.
What happened to the Watermark?
So....what happened to the Watermark?
You arent picking up what Im putting down.
The original photos are being posted somewhere without any watermark.
George then steals them and puts their watermark on the photos.
This watermark cannot then be removed by dvidshub or anyone else.
This means dvidshub cannot be stealing photos from George, magically removing the watermark, then posting it free of a watermark.
Nobody likes a crybaby.
nasty trash leaks all over the place, and sometimes cab drivers piss bottles dont have caps. just saying...
It's actually nuts. The logical hoops you have to jump through to use George banning users as some sort of proof while simultaneously banning users at the drop of a hat on GA. It's quite the double standard. Or maybe we should just concur that GA is no longer trustworthy because it is banning users... I mean that is the premise we're building the case upon right?
The logo of george.news below the newsletter links to https://dfns.tv which is shorthand for Defensetv.org ? Its build on top of the same platform paper.li, coincidence?
They could be legit, time will tell.
This is NOT a free and open forum. I miss VOAT.
Lol u sound like some butthurt commie
The simple fact that fagnews banned us for a wurstion is enough. We dont need that type of bullshit infecting our side
I’m a little confused. Why are we banning George news? Can’t we make up our minds about them ourselves. Joe Biden could be fake and yet people still post every stupid thing he says or does.
What if we’re all looking at this the wrong way? Many of us are desperate for hope and are looking for, well, anything Q related. But what if GEORGE NEWS is just simply a patriot with White House credentials sharing pics, videos, and some thoughts. Maybe it was never intended to be anything more than that? Did we all just assume that because of the name and inside access that this was somehow the Q team or somehow related? Maybe it was just meant to be a fun patriotic site. Not saying I’m right here. Just as confused as some others and trying to look at it neutrally.
I hate censorship but you aren't blocked from visiting them on your own time.
They are just blocked from being re-posted here every 5 minutes by people that don't know how the internet works.
And the day George drops anything resembling useful new information I'm sure it will be posted here... generally in 10 identical posts all at the same time. Most of them just a screenshot with no link... but I digress.
No. The smoking gun was their continued use of publicly available videos from dvidshub.net and using those videos to suggest to morons that don't investigate anything, that George was an 'insider.
The smoking gun was their continued use of publicly available photos from well known DC photographer Brendan Smialowski to suggest that they had the kind of access to Trump that Smialowski had. Photos from Getty Images.
https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/brendan-smialowski?family=editorial&phrase=brendan%20smialowski&sort=mostpopular&specificpeople=5964161#license
Here is George news picture: https://i.maga.host/75HzA5W.png
Here is Brendan Smialowski picture: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/north-koreas-leader-kim-jong-un-and-us-president-donald-news-photo/1152907302
Now you tell me those pictures weren't taken by the same person in quick succession. I bet Smialowski has more than a dozen photos, taken in a rapid succession of this.
I do and have and in all honesty, George news hasn't posted anything unique or anything that would suggest that are an 'insider'.
Did you? Did you verify every single one of them to prove they are unique?
How come you put the burden of proof on the doubters but not on the 'believers' or George news itself?
Do you not know how Telegram works? Look at a post from another user and at the bottom right of the post will be an arrow. Click on it and you can 'forward the post' of anyone. I could go on Telegram right now and forward a post from DJT Jr. to my followers.
holy shit, lol. I can't believe you're using this as evidence. Do you not realize that literally ANYONE can get a photo, go into Microsoft Paint, type some text on the photo, and then save it? Do you have a deed to the Brooklyn Bridge in your filing cabinet by any chance?
Because A LOT of people believe the election was stolen and, even if they're not an Anons, are looking for some sort of hope that justice will be done, the fraud will be revealed, and the guilty will be punished.
For Hopium Addicts, George news is holding out the pipe, supplying an endless amount of hopium, and lighting it up for all to smoke.
While Trump was in office, George news didn't matter. People had access to Trump on Twitter. From the White House website. Through people in his administration (Scavino, etc.).
With Trump out and being virtually invisible, and also being banned from Twitter, FB, etc. and the MSM not doing any stories on him, people are looking for some source, whether it's true or not. George filled that void. I would argue that it's the PERFECT time for them to make money. Who are they competing against for news on Trump right now? Pretty much no one.
Well, it doesn't make George's case look good. All they would have to do is address the questions about the videos they use being coincidentally publicly available on dvidshub and the photos they use being available on Getty images.
So instead of a simple explanation to alleviate any doubts, they ban people who raise legitimate questions. If that doesn't raise even more questions, you may not be using your brain properly.
Every concern you raised can easily be debunked.
Be more discerning. Q taught us to question everything, said no outside comms, and the minute Trump leaves office and there is a distinct lack of Trump news, you toss out everything Q taught you and fall in love with the first entity to sugar-dick you with publicly available information.
Sad!
Thanks for the downvote, George! You can ban me from your telegram but you can't ban me from GAW, faggot.
you proobablygot reported for being a faggot doomer shill
Its very simple for us folk with lines n our brains to see george is fake garbage
He brings up good points. None of your arguments are bombshell proof. You’ve been immature towards everyone trying to tell you that you’re going down the wrong path. Your ego keeps getting in the way for you to realize that maybe you were wrong and jumped the gun too quickly. You made some wrong assumptions and spiraled down a bad dig. I’ve read through all of the proof threads and they basically just explain how marketing sites operate and make connections off of not understanding building a web platform.
I’m not saying this with I’ll intent. I just wish you would put your ego aside to consider that you were wrong.
Yea i dont know what mlre u meed than THEY BLOCKED EVERY SINGKE PERSON THAT ASKED A SIMPLE FUCKIN QUESTION?!!!! If u wanna get raped by georgenews go ahead u fuckin tards
See, I’m disagreeing and you’re coming at me hot. The way you’re responding to me is part of the problem and what we should be against..
I bet most of the people that went to GN after getting fired up also went in hot. I can see why they banned people when a bunch of hyped up kids started saying the same thing.
They also have a filter bot in their channel to prevent spam.
I will admit I fell for George news. I was pretty upset and angry yesterday. I will say that after reading through all of your thread and doing some of my own research that I tend to agree with you. Unfortunately, they aren’t as credible as some may have thought. I, however, do not agree with you for banning their links. It is creating bitterness and a divide amongst us here. Please allow users to post what they would like. George news will eventually fizzle out and we will all move on as we have from other previous LARPs. I know there is a lot of pressure here, but I truly believe this is the best route.
I’ve read most of the threads. I refresh GAW all day.
I'm a software engineer / ux designer / graphic designer. I've worked in marketing before. This is what news organizations and publications do.. they pull content from stock sites.
Nothing they have posted is stolen. Have you gone through their faq?
https://www.dvidshub.net/about/faq
"Information presented on or via DVIDS is considered public information and may be distributed or copied unless otherwise specified"
"DVIDS receives content from many branches and offices of the DoD and U.S. Federal Government. In general, all content on DVIDS is in the Public Domain."
Your argument might end up being that they presented the information as their own. What we're saying is.. is ALL of their content from stock sites? It doesn't seem like it and there's nothing to show that's true.
I don't have strong feelings one way or the other about George News, but I do have a strong feeling that people are taking sides, and things are becoming divisive on the forum. No one had a problem with the receipts provided in the moderator's post, but when someone becomes dictator and tries to be the thought-police because others have a differing opinion, that creates an issue on a forum where free thought and speech should be lauded. I mean, we can go to Twitter or FB to be banned.
I asked pertinent questions yesterday about the meaning of outside comms. I never received an answer. For example, what makes George News an outside comm, but Pompeo, Scavino, et al, tweets are not considered outside comms? Legitimate question with no intent to doom. People are scouring the boards and sharing connections.
I do think the problem is not that the moderator has a problem with George News and that he laid out his reasons with receipts. The problem is that the moderator expects everyone to believe as he believes, to accept his receipts or be damned, but this is a forum in which those like the commentator of this thread have done equal research and come to a different conclusion. That is freedom of thought transformed into freedom of speech. It's opposition to the moderator but it is also open debate which by the act of banning has turned it into a free-for-all with people taking sides, which is not what this forum is meant to do.
The irony of being banned for giving an opinion that opposes a moderator's opinion should not be lost on anyone. The moderator opened a can of worms that may not be resolved until the moderator can tuck the pride inside and realize that freedom of thought and speech are not his to moderate.
Again, I don't hold an opinion on George News. I generally see it through the lens of others who are watching and provide analysis of certain topics. Are they comms or just good information? To me, that's a question worthy of Pompeo and Scavino tweets as well. But no one's going to get banned for announcing that Pompeo tweeted Scripture on Sunday and relating it to Q. But God forbid, someone try to do the same with George News.
Not a good call at all. People are tired of what is happening to them in reality. The general population on this board have had an election stolen from them, have seen injustices continue, are rightfully upset by the fact that a virus has been used to call many into submission, and they come here for answers only to find out that this board is no better than FB or Twitter.
there is also forum slide at work here.