There is no evidence for your point though? You said they STOLE that content from those sources... you can't steal public content. Marketing/publications use stock resources all the time. If you think that is nefarious. It explains why you think you're right.
You fundamentally do not understand how marketing works and are basing your argument off that wrong pretense.
Did you prove every image they posted is from a stock site? Have you tried to confirm that some of their images are original content they took? I don't think so..
How is there a middle ground to meet though? You said they stole the content and I showed you how they didn't. Which part of that is confusing? Dvids literally tells you that their content if free for public use.
There is no evidence for your point though? You said they STOLE that content from those sources... you can't steal public content. Marketing/publications use stock resources all the time. If you think that is nefarious. It explains why you think you're right.
You fundamentally do not understand how marketing works and are basing your argument off that wrong pretense.
Did you prove every image they posted is from a stock site? Have you tried to confirm that some of their images are original content they took? I don't think so..
How is there a middle ground to meet though? You said they stole the content and I showed you how they didn't. Which part of that is confusing? Dvids literally tells you that their content if free for public use.