Well thank God you didn't remove my thread, but that's no proof that you're stopping us from having civil discussion. Your slight "we're DoD credentialed, reeeee" says otherwise about your intentions. Your post about banning George from this site also says otherwise, but good thing you are limiting it to links. But you don't realize the subtleties of declaring it banned. That declaration in itself stops civil discussion for fear of the ban hammer that you claim to meekly holster. That's not to mention the users who reach out privately to me by DM who say they have been banned and permabanned in relation to your crusade.
I posted about George because I thought they had something interesting to share. And yes, there have been many things interesting that they shared. I also keep an eye on George because maybe, just maybe they could prove to be an integral part of Trump's team.
And as for me proving you right or wrong beyond a shadow of a doubt. I'm just a regular bloke from Australia with weak autistic features. I'd like to think that I have decent reasoning skills, but I don't have access to the sorts of resources and knowledge of the US that you do and I don't have perfect machine-like reasoning. All I can do is point and say, "Have you considered this" or "Here's something I found, does it mean anything?" But I'm invested because this affects all of us from around the world. George News seems to have something, so that's why I've taken interest in them. I could be wrong and I'm open to being wrong, but that's what I'm looking at, despite your banning from their telegram. I actually thought your approach and the approach of other anons on Telegram was tactless.
You read me wrong. You do not hold the only truth. That's a hyperbole, and you should know it. A case in point is the gifs. I complained about the gifs because they did indeed make me motion sick, because the rest of the screen is stationary. But I thought it was a great addition to the website. Thankfully I found a solution to that. It's unfortunate that you took offense to that because I genuinely thought highly of you for making it work. So, while you thought I was complaining about the gifs because I didn't like them or something petty, in reality I was trying to me it not interfere with my experience with the site. And yes, I did solve part of the solution myself with your input. Once that was done I appreciated what you did. Two different truths to make one whole truth.
Well thank God you didn't remove my thread, but that's no proof that you're stopping us from having civil discussion. Your slight "we're DoD credentialed, reeeee" says otherwise about your intentions. Your post about banning George from this site also says otherwise, but good thing you are limiting it to links. But you don't realize the subtleties of declaring it banned. That declaration in itself stops civil discussion for fear of the ban hammer that you claim to meekly holster. That's not to mention the users who reach out privately to me by DM who say they have been banned and permabanned in relation to your crusade.
I posted about George because I thought they had something interesting to share. And yes, there have been many things interesting that they shared. I also keep an eye on George because maybe, just maybe they could prove to be an integral part of Trump's team.
And as for me proving you right or wrong beyond a shadow of a doubt. I'm just a regular bloke from Australia with weak autistic features. I'd like to think that I have decent reasoning skills, but I don't have access to the sorts of resources and knowledge of the US that you do and I don't have perfect machine-like reasoning. All I can do is point and say, "Have you considered this" or "Here's something I found, does it mean anything?" But I'm invested because this affects all of us from around the world. George News seems to have something, so that's why I've taken interest in them. I could be wrong and I'm open to being wrong, but that's what I'm looking at, despite your banning from their telegram. I actually thought your approach and the approach of other anons on Telegram was tactless.
You read me wrong. You do not hold the only truth. That's a hyperbole, and you should know it. A case in point is the gifs. I complained about the gifs because they did indeed make me motion sick, because the rest of the screen is stationary. But I thought it was a great addition to the website. Thankfully I found a solution to that. It's unfortunate that you took offense to that because I genuinely thought highly of you for making it work. So, while you thought I was complaining about the gifs because I didn't like them or something petty, in reality I was trying to me it not interfere with my experience with the site. And yes, I did solve part of the solution myself with your input. Once that was done I appreciated what you did. Two different truths to make one whole truth.