I think that point was originally made by allowing discussion of george, but the ban of links was to stop the nonsense spreading here. now we get more nonsense. george news sux in my opinion from before Evspra pointed this shit out. pushing the point to this extreme and dogpiling on a mod is a tactic of forum slide. i think you and a few others were in on the forum slide either by knowledge or ignorance, either way, i see this forum sliding everyday.
Firstly, how are we to attribute discussion of GN without attribution to its source?
Secondly, you say forum slide, and yet, I don’t think you know what a forum slide is. This whole thing came about in a matter of a couple of days, and my understanding of a forum slide is that it is supposed to be a long game sort of thing.
If anything, your defense of censorship and a ban spree by a rogue mod seems more like forum attacking tactics to me.
And nobody “pushed this to the extreme” except Evspra and those who supported the censorship and ban spree. Everybody else was just attempting to protect our ability to communicate, research, and voice ourselves.
If you are truly not a shill or forum attacker, I am at a total loss as to why you would not understand this.
the focus of this "forum slide" attack was to be rid of a long time mod. mission accomplished. you not seeing how it is forum slide astonishes me, especially how the "fight of censorship" is a trademark battle cry of many that engage in forum slide. if you are not a knowing agent in this, then when you realize what i am talking about, it will be too late.
I think that point was originally made by allowing discussion of george, but the ban of links was to stop the nonsense spreading here. now we get more nonsense. george news sux in my opinion from before Evspra pointed this shit out. pushing the point to this extreme and dogpiling on a mod is a tactic of forum slide. i think you and a few others were in on the forum slide either by knowledge or ignorance, either way, i see this forum sliding everyday.
Firstly, how are we to attribute discussion of GN without attribution to its source?
Secondly, you say forum slide, and yet, I don’t think you know what a forum slide is. This whole thing came about in a matter of a couple of days, and my understanding of a forum slide is that it is supposed to be a long game sort of thing.
If anything, your defense of censorship and a ban spree by a rogue mod seems more like forum attacking tactics to me.
And nobody “pushed this to the extreme” except Evspra and those who supported the censorship and ban spree. Everybody else was just attempting to protect our ability to communicate, research, and voice ourselves.
If you are truly not a shill or forum attacker, I am at a total loss as to why you would not understand this.
the focus of this "forum slide" attack was to be rid of a long time mod. mission accomplished. you not seeing how it is forum slide astonishes me, especially how the "fight of censorship" is a trademark battle cry of many that engage in forum slide. if you are not a knowing agent in this, then when you realize what i am talking about, it will be too late.
Evspra brought this on themselves. Nobody forced them to censor information or go on a ban spree. Get your head out of your ass.
my head has not been up my ass, but maybe look to yours. there is more going on here than Evspra banning a few shills and not liking george.