I have purposely separated myself from the debate regarding George News because in my view George News is irrelevant to our goals of restoring our Constitutional Republic.
In my estimation, George is fairly harmless. All it has done is offer spiritual support and some cool pics. It seems to me that it is George followers that have elevated the source to almost Q like levels, not George itself. George does not inspire strong feelings for or against in me, though I remain wary.
But there has been some important questions that I see arising from this melodrama.
Everyone put on your critical thinking cap and ask who would benefit most from a schism here at GAW. And then contemplate how you would go about creating said schism when the normal shill tactics have failed.
We are anons and, by definition, none of us knows anyone here or their backstory. By necessity we must put blind trust forward as currency to a certain extent if we are to remain a community with common goals. We know most of the shills tactics and attack patterns and are pretty good at weeding them out with hopefully as little collateral damage as possible.
Spring has come on full force this week in SE Lower Michigan. As a concrete contractor that has meant starting this past Monday I am working 10 hours in the field instead of sending out a skeleton crew with instructions and working from home (OK playing with my grandkids more than working). So admittedly I have missed most of the drama.
But I did see the informal poll posted by Evspra this morning which showed overwhelming support for his George link ban. So another question that has left me somewhat confused is why did Evspra pick up his ball and go home? Usually people firm in their convictions dont act this way.
I hope this doesnt get lost in the fog. I think these questions need to be asked and even if we can not find a satisfactory answer maybe we can learn and grow.
I have purposely separated myself from the debate regarding George News because in my view George News is irrelevant to our goals of restoring our Constitutional Republic.
In my estimation, George is fairly harmless. All it has done is offer spiritual support and some cool pics. It seems to me that it is George followers that have elevated the source to almost Q like levels, not George itself. George does not inspire strong feelings for or against in me, though I remain wary.
But there has been some important questions that I see arising from this melodrama.
Everyone put on your critical thinking cap and ask who would benefit most from a schism here at GAW. And then contemplate how you would go about creating said schism when the normal shill tactics have failed.
We are anons and, by definition, none of us knows anyone here or their backstory. By necessity we must put blind trust forward as currency to a certain extent if we are to remain a community with common goals. We know most of the shills tactics and attack patterns and are pretty good at weeding them out with hopefully as little collateral damage as possible.
Spring has come on full force this week in SE Lower Michigan. As a concrete contractor that has meant starting this past Monday I am working 10 hours in the field instead of sending out a skeleton crew with instructions and working from home (OK playing with my grandkids more than working). So admittedly I have missed most of the drama.
But I did see the informal poll posted by Evspra this morning which showed overwhelming support for his George link ban. So another question that has left me somewhat confused is why did Evspra pick up his ball and go home? Usually people firm in their convictions dont act this way.
I hope this doesnt get lost in the fog. I think these questions need to be asked and even if we can not find a satisfactory answer maybe we can learn and grow.