?

Been a member of forums since the late 90s and this happens all the time (or did back then). He had valid points. I think there may have been valid counter points tho. I think we and he should be able to agree to disagree. I didn't agree with his assessment, but that didn't mean I thought he was a poor mod. He felt deeply that his conclusion was correct (moreso than mine, I'll admit).

Maybe a better idea would have been to add a disclaimer to any George links (which could easily be done with CSS) that it's believed to be a larp by some... but, there's a LOT of larp-level material here that gets posted (links to sketchy news sites, people with unknown affiliations, etc), so where is the line and limit? That's the issue with social media now – they're determining for everyone else what's right/wrong/true/false. I know this wasn't the heart, but maybe how some felt. I just saw it as the typical forum drama and personally wish he would have stayed the course and didn't delete the account.