Alright, well someone has to aggregate all the shit into one post for people to make up their own minds. After all, Q told us to ask questions and do our own research, right?
That said, at the heart of the matter is the simple question: 'Does GEORGE news have insider info and/or access to Trump?'
In my opinion the simple answer is no. I haven't yet seen irrefutable proof on any of GEORGE's various accounts (Telegram, YT, etc.) that constitutes such proof.
I'll post the information I have researched to come to this conclusion. Use it as you will.
First, the videos
To me this is the biggest issue that GEORGE needs to address. Every video they have posted on YT and Telegram that seems to have some inside information is simply reposted DoD videos from the DVIDSHUB.NET website.
Here is an example. On GEORGE's YouTube channel, they post this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV8fj_5qMx0
They do not cite the source of the video. The video description simply says: "U.S. Soldiers with the Wisconsin and Illinois National Guard were deputized yesterday, in the U.S. Capitol Building Jan. 18, 2021".
In my opinion, this is on purpose. It leads non-thinkers to believe that GEORGE was there, taking the video.
However if you go to https://www.dvidshub.net/video/780799/national-guard-soldiers-deputized-us-capitol you find the same exact video.
Just about every military based video on their YouTube channel can be found on DVIDSHUB.NET.
Second, the pictures
GEORGE posts pictures that also seem to indicate a high level of security access. However upon further inspection, they seem to be pictures from AFP photographers that are publicly available. One such photographer is well known DC photographer, Brendan Smialowski.
GEORGE posts this picture on Telegram getting people all worked up.
https://i.maga.host/75HzA5W.png
I remember the threads here wondering who GEORGE is and then sifting through pictures looking for a guy with an Apple watch. Misdirected analysis. For GEORGE to be the guy with the Apple watch, it means he's taking a picture with his left hand and then taking ANOTHER picture with his right hand of himself taking a picture with his cell phone in his left hand.
This makes absolutely ZERO sense.
Instead, I believe the person who took that picture was standing just behind the person with the Apple watch, and shot the picture over his left shoulder.
Here is a picture of that same scene from ABC news: https://s.abcnews.com/images/WNT/190630_wn_karl_hpMain_16x9_992.jpg
Now let's check out Getty Images. Here's what you can do yourself:
Go to Getty Images: https://www.gettyimages.com/
Search for: Brendan Smialowski
Then on the left side, click on 'SPECIFIC PEOPLE'
It will bring up a few names like Obama, Trump, etc. look below the names and you will see a link titled 'See more specific people >'
Click on that and a popup list will appear. Click on the letter K and then choose 'Kim Jong-Un'.
That should bring you to the photo library for the NK visit. Look through them and compare Smialowski's pictures to the one that George news posted.
Specifically this one: https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/north-koreas-leader-kim-jong-un-and-us-president-donald-news-photo/1152907302
To me it looks like the GEORGE picture was taken from the same angle (ie. same person) a second or two after the Getty Images picture.
SAVING THIS FOR NOW....WILL ADD MORE LATER
GN had a chance to have an army backing them. Instead they banned and shut down convo when asked a simple question my the mod. That’s the actions of a con artist. IMO they already showed their hand. They did no damage control when given the opportunity as would be expected of a legitimate channel. I had hoped they were who they said they were but they didn’t seem to care to verify who they are or if they are legit. That says all I need to know.
Their bot banned a bunch of people who all copy and pasted a question from an evspra post he stickyd and told people to go to their chat. the chat bot thought all these these people were spam. its as simple as that.
They really popped up hard when 8kun went live, they scooped up 8kun.org I believe and had it redirecting to their site. Maybe that's why 8kun ended up with .top.
They try to act like another "Q" by posting stuff to authenticate themselves, but they never drop any content. Just vague "proofs" over and over, and nice platitudes. They do boost morale but it seems superficial.
They accept people's money.
Their youtube channels have only prospered since the purge. And they get superchats
They reacted very badly and sus as fuck upon Evs exposé.
They can kindly fuck off now
I never got the whole George thing to begin with. Yeah they made some intersting posts but I didnt get the idea that they were anything but another source of "news".
Am I completely mistaken or did someone (I thought from this site) maybe a couple weeks back ask GN in their chat to have Pompeo post some very specific scripture and then he ended up tweeting something almost the same? Does anyone else remember this or did I just dream it?
However, the first thing you see in the video's description is a link to george news. And there you see "shared by georgenews" on every post, as well as who the credit goes to. It seems the purpose of their video and picture posts is to drive traffic to their website, where appropriate credit is given for all their posts. If a viewer assumes at first glance that they took the video, isn't the viewer responsible for that assumption? It only takes one click to see their whole web presence is about sharing from other sources.
Edit: I never got into the whole georgenews thing and haven't been emotionally invested. This is just what I found immediately when clicking through in response to your post
Same as this ^
I’ve seen the Brendan Smialowski photo gallery brought up a few times but nobody ever mentions the fact that there are like 12 other people taking photos at the same scene. Their photos are all likely to be similar. Also... the exact picture that was posted by George News isn’t there. So how does this prove anything for or against the photo being exclusive to George? This Brendan guy could BE one of the Georges. The very American looking woman wearing Converse could be one of them. It’s hard to say.
A photographer doesn't put every one of his photos on getty images. Just the ones possible to be bought.
Certainly, a photo of Trump and Un with someone's arm in the way isn't likely to be purchased.
Hence why it doesn’t prove anything?
Also a quick look at his Wikipedia led me to find out that he took that picture of Bernie Sanders that vent viral from the inauguration ?
The one thing that confuses me the most is the tagline. George (the magazine) used the tagline "Not Just Politics As Usual." George News does, too. You would think this would be a copyright infringement and if it is, why does George News continue to use it?
no one from the magazine to sue them?
It's expired, last active in 2013.
u/GoAskAlice
Thank you for finding that.
What’s about the location pin drops on maps ?
Aren’t some of those in mar a lago?
Sure you could visit as a regular citizen, has there been any other places they drop a pin?
Why do you care? "No outside Comms!"
I thought George became relevant with a Q post that read "Hello George", no?
George soros