X22 puts up his own content, 100%. George only steals other's content and watermarks it as their own.
As far as him acting like he's "in the know", I don't take him that way ... I take him more like Joe M, he's repeating things Q said and making statements of certainty based on Q's message.
As long as he's not adding to Q's message stuff that Q never said, I don't see a problem.
That being said, I've only listened to him a handful of times so if I'm wrong about the info he's producing, feel free to contradict.
Yes, he doesn't claim to have insider access in the same way George News did. He simply makes logical arguments and cites information that's already out in the public sphere.
I’m just wondering, since Dave obviously reads here and picks up stories to discuss on his show, if he’s going to stop talking about George or maybe mention they were discredited. He did refer to a George story in the previous episode (or the one before it.) Just curious to see what he does.
That being said, X22 predates Q quite a few years if I understand correctly. I think he’s just compiling info and giving a little interpretation/synthesis. He’s fairly benign in this sense, in my opinion.
Agree 100%. Been listening to Dave for a very long time. That is exactly my take on him. We go up and down listening. Sometimes I agree with his analysis / forecast, other times I may think he full of shit. However, he's been right about a TON more crap than I have & brings things to my attention that I passed by or didn't put together. Sometimes his voice puts me to sleep. Very soothing. :-) He provides a good honest service, to truth seekers, to the best of his abilities.
I see people comparing George with X22.
So here's a difference ...
X22 puts up his own content, 100%. George only steals other's content and watermarks it as their own.
As far as him acting like he's "in the know", I don't take him that way ... I take him more like Joe M, he's repeating things Q said and making statements of certainty based on Q's message.
As long as he's not adding to Q's message stuff that Q never said, I don't see a problem.
That being said, I've only listened to him a handful of times so if I'm wrong about the info he's producing, feel free to contradict.
Yes, he doesn't claim to have insider access in the same way George News did. He simply makes logical arguments and cites information that's already out in the public sphere.
i follow george and cant find anywhere they made that claim. do you have proof of your claim?
I’m just wondering, since Dave obviously reads here and picks up stories to discuss on his show, if he’s going to stop talking about George or maybe mention they were discredited. He did refer to a George story in the previous episode (or the one before it.) Just curious to see what he does.
That being said, X22 predates Q quite a few years if I understand correctly. I think he’s just compiling info and giving a little interpretation/synthesis. He’s fairly benign in this sense, in my opinion.
Agree 100%. Been listening to Dave for a very long time. That is exactly my take on him. We go up and down listening. Sometimes I agree with his analysis / forecast, other times I may think he full of shit. However, he's been right about a TON more crap than I have & brings things to my attention that I passed by or didn't put together. Sometimes his voice puts me to sleep. Very soothing. :-) He provides a good honest service, to truth seekers, to the best of his abilities.