It took 3 hours from Evspra's inital 'a look into post' to him declaring the George News ban. Some of his research seemed solid at first glance, some of it not as solid. There wasn't much time for anons to 'check his work'(aka research and provide counter-points to ensure his conclusion was super solid) and no real discussion("errmeerrgawd I feel so betrayed by George" isn't discussion) before he took it upon himself to declare the ban on links to George.
What's more are the insane amount of accounts that dogpiled George and anyone else who pointed out the oddity of Evspra's actions, or even the actions of everyone doing the dogpiling. Pointing out odd behavior in our community or trying to add some rational thoughts shouldn't be met with downvotes or gnashing teeth. Another oddity for me is how he and many accounts claim that they were insta-banned from George's chat the moment they posted something about the dvids site, yet I literally quoted a line the Evspra told us to quote and pasted it in the George chat and have not been banned.
Following Evspra's departure, many accounts are all like "my mod god is gone~~" or "Evspra if you can see this come back~~~". Many of these accounts keep puffing up Evspra like he's some kind of .win messiah. What's interesting to me is how despite seeing comments like this, the guy never put down that personality cult type of talk. Even this post leads into this. Didn't Q tell us not to worship him? Why would we do such a thing for a mod?
FOR THE RECORD, I've been doing some digging on George News. They've deleted the majority of the messages from the past few days, which is very suspicious. They have no contact info, liaison, or point of contact if you want to reach them. I've emailed the address they have in their shop to see if they can point me to a point of contact, and their response is basically 'contact them directly'. Kind of shady.
One thing I’ll add/clarify, GN has their comments set on telegram to auto delete after 24 hours, which explains their disappearance. Some have been manually removed, for sure, but others just expired.
That guy clearly is trolling, Evspra is the most logical and arguably one of the best mods. I got no clue what happened over past 2 days, as I was not too present here, so trying to figure it out as well.
Apparently he proved that georgenews is a bunch of larpers, with basically minimal effort. The rest Im not sure about. Q said there are "no outside coms" so I think Evspras research was legit over the target.
You are wrong with this statement. But thats to be expected from a 39 day old account. I checked on your recent posts, and a few were updooted by me, you produce some decent content, but in this case I think you are wrong.
Basically attempted to be a Reddit-tier mod and "think for others."
I had an opportunity to have a fairly long discussion with Evspra and the dude is solid, not a "reddit-tier mod".
Regardless of the standing of GN, one mod created a huge division here because of his actions, not because of his "research". That alone should raise the red flags. Creating division is a tool of suppression.
yes he did. he banned me twice in the same day for pointing holes in his research. he banned many that day, all for dissent. thats why he was stripped of his mod status
So if that was true then Evspra would've acted like that at conspiracies.win, but that didn't happen.
Something was not right with this whole deal. I can’t put my finger on it but that just my gut. In the end we lost a good mod.
It took 3 hours from Evspra's inital 'a look into post' to him declaring the George News ban. Some of his research seemed solid at first glance, some of it not as solid. There wasn't much time for anons to 'check his work'(aka research and provide counter-points to ensure his conclusion was super solid) and no real discussion("errmeerrgawd I feel so betrayed by George" isn't discussion) before he took it upon himself to declare the ban on links to George.
What's more are the insane amount of accounts that dogpiled George and anyone else who pointed out the oddity of Evspra's actions, or even the actions of everyone doing the dogpiling. Pointing out odd behavior in our community or trying to add some rational thoughts shouldn't be met with downvotes or gnashing teeth. Another oddity for me is how he and many accounts claim that they were insta-banned from George's chat the moment they posted something about the dvids site, yet I literally quoted a line the Evspra told us to quote and pasted it in the George chat and have not been banned.
Following Evspra's departure, many accounts are all like "my mod god is gone~~" or "Evspra if you can see this come back~~~". Many of these accounts keep puffing up Evspra like he's some kind of .win messiah. What's interesting to me is how despite seeing comments like this, the guy never put down that personality cult type of talk. Even this post leads into this. Didn't Q tell us not to worship him? Why would we do such a thing for a mod?
FOR THE RECORD, I've been doing some digging on George News. They've deleted the majority of the messages from the past few days, which is very suspicious. They have no contact info, liaison, or point of contact if you want to reach them. I've emailed the address they have in their shop to see if they can point me to a point of contact, and their response is basically 'contact them directly'. Kind of shady.
MARCH MADNESS
demonite10 -- if the whole stinking mess wasn't a shillpack in action, I'll eat my hat.
<upvoted>
<also upvoting @MAGA_coin, who is obviously a target of aforementioned shillpack today>
One thing I’ll add/clarify, GN has their comments set on telegram to auto delete after 24 hours, which explains their disappearance. Some have been manually removed, for sure, but others just expired.
That guy clearly is trolling, Evspra is the most logical and arguably one of the best mods. I got no clue what happened over past 2 days, as I was not too present here, so trying to figure it out as well.
Apparently he proved that georgenews is a bunch of larpers, with basically minimal effort. The rest Im not sure about. Q said there are "no outside coms" so I think Evspras research was legit over the target.
You are wrong with this statement. But thats to be expected from a 39 day old account. I checked on your recent posts, and a few were updooted by me, you produce some decent content, but in this case I think you are wrong.
I had an opportunity to have a fairly long discussion with Evspra and the dude is solid, not a "reddit-tier mod".
Regardless of the standing of GN, one mod created a huge division here because of his actions, not because of his "research". That alone should raise the red flags. Creating division is a tool of suppression.
This isn't an open forum. Its a topic forum. Evspra was a moderator. Its literally his job description.
He never censored discussions or even banned discussions. Why do you lie?
yes he did. he banned me twice in the same day for pointing holes in his research. he banned many that day, all for dissent. thats why he was stripped of his mod status