So you feel like it's acceptable to post off topic information here?
No bans were made of discussion of GN. The parameters you mentioned
"With regard to George New, I think only those posts which attempt to decode Q messages and such using GN timestamps or content should be banned."
is what was going to be banned. Posts that were going to "ACTIVELY mislead people."
Should shills ever be banned? Or should they be allowed to spam their "Personal opinions, and posts which clearly express nothing more than a personal opinion" to the detriment of the forum?
Obviously the posts need to be on topic. We don't people posting cooking recipes here. I'm sorry if that was not clear. But, in answer to your question, shills have as much right to express their opinions as everyone else. So long as they are making on topic posts, then yes. Shills should be allowed to state their opinions. If I get tired of seeing them, I can block them.
That is a good question. I think everyone will have a different tolerance. Which is why we need more education about how to use the "block" button. Possibly a curated list of blocked accounts that we can elect to subscribe to, as opposed to an outright ban. Similar to how SPAM filtering works.
Have you ever been to a club, like a birdwatching club? I'm a birdwatcher. I bring my binoculars and field guide. I don't bring an electric guitar. It's annoying to the birds. And it doesn't, you know, make sense? Maybe shills would be better served in forums where their opinions, you know, make more sense? Especially seeing as there are SO MANY other options and we really only have a few options for exclusively Q research. Just a thought.
So you feel like it's acceptable to post off topic information here?
No bans were made of discussion of GN. The parameters you mentioned
"With regard to George New, I think only those posts which attempt to decode Q messages and such using GN timestamps or content should be banned."
is what was going to be banned. Posts that were going to "ACTIVELY mislead people."
Should shills ever be banned? Or should they be allowed to spam their "Personal opinions, and posts which clearly express nothing more than a personal opinion" to the detriment of the forum?
Obviously the posts need to be on topic. We don't people posting cooking recipes here. I'm sorry if that was not clear. But, in answer to your question, shills have as much right to express their opinions as everyone else. So long as they are making on topic posts, then yes. Shills should be allowed to state their opinions. If I get tired of seeing them, I can block them.
What concentration of shills is acceptable for you?
That is a good question. I think everyone will have a different tolerance. Which is why we need more education about how to use the "block" button. Possibly a curated list of blocked accounts that we can elect to subscribe to, as opposed to an outright ban. Similar to how SPAM filtering works.
Have you ever been to a club, like a birdwatching club? I'm a birdwatcher. I bring my binoculars and field guide. I don't bring an electric guitar. It's annoying to the birds. And it doesn't, you know, make sense? Maybe shills would be better served in forums where their opinions, you know, make more sense? Especially seeing as there are SO MANY other options and we really only have a few options for exclusively Q research. Just a thought.
Btw this is the funniest thing I have seen today-
"a curated list of blocked accounts that we can elect to subscribe to"
really? I'm not sure there's a huge market for that. lol.