Gerald Schroeder makes a good analogy when he says what are the chances that a tornado moving through a junkyard will end up building an airplane.
Nothing supports the idea of random or gradual evolution. The mechanics of natural selection don't favor it. The time that earth has existed doesn't favor it. Events like the Cambrian explosion invalidate it completely.
Modern secular science has a bias against anything related to God or the supernatural. They will go to any improbable length to keep God out of their clubhouse. Look at the multiverse theory. In order to not have to ponder the existence of one unobservable God they instead decided to theorize the existence of an infinite number of unobservable universes. Which one of those two options is a bigger leap of faith lol?
Gerald Schroeder makes a good analogy when he says what are the chances that a tornado moving through a junkyard will end up building an airplane.
Nothing supports the idea of random or gradual evolution. The mechanics of natural selection don't favor it. The time that earth has existed doesn't favor it. Events like the Cambrian explosion invalidate it completely.
Modern secular science has a bias against anything related to God or the supernatural. They will go to any improbable length to keep God out of their clubhouse. Look at the multiverse theory. In order to not have to ponder the existence of one unobservable God they instead decided to theorize the existence of an infinite number of unobservable universes. Which one of those two options is a bigger leap of faith lol?