That point being if the citizenry votes in a way that she doesn’t approve, then she will use taxpayer money to launch a legal campaign to nullify the amendment to the constitution that was lawfully instated by ballot initiative.
Like she has done with the recreational legalization of cannabis. She even found a judge that agreed with her paper thin technicality.
She is overriding the legitimate will of the people of her state.
Yeah, she’s good. Up to a point.
That point being if the citizenry votes in a way that she doesn’t approve, then she will use taxpayer money to launch a legal campaign to nullify the amendment to the constitution that was lawfully instated by ballot initiative.
Like she has done with the recreational legalization of cannabis. She even found a judge that agreed with her paper thin technicality.
She is overriding the legitimate will of the people of her state.
It is it’s own brand of tyrannical.