I'm saying it could be a fluke, or it could be intentional. There's way too little to go on from a single shot like this and way too many assumptions have been overturned from additional proofs on a particular item/subject in the last 4 years of Q being the focus. People tend to get over excited on way too little without examining thoroughly.
If there were another shot from another angle showing the exact same thing, it might be an eyebrow raiser and chin stroker. As is? Nah...a fluke of camera angle...
I'm saying it could be a fluke, or it could be intentional. There's way too little to go on from a single shot like this and way too many assumptions have been overturned from additional proofs on a particular item/subject in the last 4 years of Q being the focus. People tend to get over excited on way too little without examining thoroughly.
If there were another shot from another angle showing the exact same thing, it might be an eyebrow raiser and chin stroker. As is? Nah...a fluke of camera angle...