My apologies for doubting you, OP. It says something different in the actual article itself. May I suggest that to avoid future misunderstandings , you always should post the website addy, along with your assertion. We, as a group, are always skeptical and want to see the proof. Thanx, OP.
This makes you wonder if this didn't happen during his presidency, and someone has brought it forward either because they didn't know or because they're trolling and trying to get us to comment. I have been guilty of not looking for specific dates on postings.
I literally just read the article and it said both the words 'former President and ex-Commander-in Chief.' So that's not true.
it doesn't appear in the article - it appears on the homepage where the article is previewed
Fake
Sure is...and here's the sauce:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9357535/Trump-makes-surprise-appearance-Mar-Lago-fundraiser-helping-rescue-dogs-China.html
it says, "ex-commander-in-chief"
OP is a shill -- just joined 15 mins ago and is only posting.
it doesn't appear in the article - it appears on the homepage where the article is previewed
Stand down, frens. OP is correct. It does say "commander-in-chief" on the homepage.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
My apologies for doubting you, OP. It says something different in the actual article itself. May I suggest that to avoid future misunderstandings , you always should post the website addy, along with your assertion. We, as a group, are always skeptical and want to see the proof. Thanx, OP.
I wish he would lose some weight, he is a national treasure and we need him to live for a very long time.
This is also not Trump. Its his double. Skin color and weight are off.
But the timing of it is interesting considering all the recent dog comms.
Why recreate with your crappy fake fonts instead of a simple screenshot? What is OP hiding?
nothing - it doesn't appear in the article - it appears on the dailymail.com homepage where the article is previewed
go right now to dailymail.com homepage where the article is previewed - i'm writing this at 11:23 EST and it says "The Commander-in-chief"
This makes you wonder if this didn't happen during his presidency, and someone has brought it forward either because they didn't know or because they're trolling and trying to get us to comment. I have been guilty of not looking for specific dates on postings.
Perhaps a "dog comm" rebuttal to all the dog comms coming out of the demtards lately?