Hi, I have a question. I got into a long discussion with my law-student brother who, while very conservative and a Trump voter, is certainly no anon and very by the books. He said to me about Pence’s decision on the 6th that it was his constitutional duty to certify the votes, even though they may have been fraudulent, because the states had given him their already certified votes. In other words, the states came to pence and said, “we elected this guy, we’ve already certified it.” This left Pence, even if he knew the votes were fraudulent, no choice but to push them through because the constitution dictates it so. The VP “shall” certify the votes, notwithstanding the validity of them, since they’ve gotten to that point. Hopefully this makes sense.
What are your thoughts on this?
Given that having Pence throw up his hand and say “Stop!” was patently not how the Q plan was designed to go down, that part about upholding that precedent for the future is a nice side-benefit. Not that the Left will waver for a moment about kicking aside precedent, or the text of the Constitution, for that matter, when they can get away with it and further entrench themselves in power.
Also, I still think, despite my beloved Lin Wood throwing, um, shade on him... I think there’s still a decent chance Pence was a “white hat”.
Nah, guys that sodomize teen boys are not white hats.
From what my Voter fraud research tells me back in November Pence needed a good spanking...