Hi, I have a question. I got into a long discussion with my law-student brother who, while very conservative and a Trump voter, is certainly no anon and very by the books. He said to me about Pence’s decision on the 6th that it was his constitutional duty to certify the votes, even though they may have been fraudulent, because the states had given him their already certified votes. In other words, the states came to pence and said, “we elected this guy, we’ve already certified it.” This left Pence, even if he knew the votes were fraudulent, no choice but to push them through because the constitution dictates it so. The VP “shall” certify the votes, notwithstanding the validity of them, since they’ve gotten to that point. Hopefully this makes sense.
What are your thoughts on this?
Very true. Poor phrasing on my part. But with you all the way.
I very much appreciate your dedication to accuracy.
And (if I can recall my mind-frame of 17 minutes ago) I don’t think I was even intending to quibble with you on that particular assertion; I just liked what you wrote later on, and wanted to call it out... but then felt I better disqualify the notion that I agreed with your earlier statement. For the benefit of the approximately two (2) more people who will likely ever read through the comments this already 3-hour-old thread. Yes, this is how my mind actually works. ?
TL;DR it’s all good, fren.
Appreciate the sentiment. It's been a long day battling idiots for all of us. :)