I agree that it misses a lot of important details, and even mixes up a couple things, or at least I have heard/read other versions of certain events that seem more probable in a few of his expositions. But it lays it all out pretty well, and provided a few details I had not seen before. I think it is a good primer, with the footnote that more research should be done on the minutia.
I agree that it misses a lot of important details, and even mixes up a couple things, or at least I have heard/read other versions of certain events that seem more probable in a few of his expositions. But it lays it all out pretty well, and provided a few details I had not seen before. I think it is a good primer, with the footnote that more research should be done on the minutia.