How else can corruption be eliminated? Live simple and remove them from our lives.
Money has no value, labor and goods do, however.
The value of money is an illusion and a means of control.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Which is also a useless representation of labor and goods, but I do own silver. ?
Thx 4 the needed sanity here, fren.
Going from “tyrants are trampling on our rights” to “let’s mandate a ban of all intermediary currencies” is frighteningly unserious.
And it’s classic “horseshoe theory”. When people move so far to the “right” that they become unmoored from principles and reality, they start to sound eerily like Leftists.
And hey, if people want to live like that, to reject money and only trade by direct barter, in a free country, you can! (I just don’t think they’d like it very much... at all ?)
Investing? Like hedge funds? Good.
I mean is this really that bad of a thing? Tribal times planning 1-2 years out at most is more along what is more natural to us as humans.
Agree, but money enables this corruption. I'm thinking simplify.
Money was used as an intrinsic part of the wide spread corruption. So was human nature. So was communication. So was every single tool we have ever created.
Should we eliminate all of the tools they used to dominate our society? No more hammers. No more forks. We can't use agriculture, because they have used that against us. We can't use the wheel. They've used that against us too. No more language. No more speaking or writing. Its all been used against us.
A tool is not evil. Evil people use tools for evil purposes. We are removing their evil. A tool will be just a tool again. I'm not throwing out my tools!
A real tangible asset like silver or gold is a convenient barter intermediate. These metals were used for adornment before they were used as this intermediate. Their rarity made them very valuable v. their mass/volume, and their intrinsic value (value having nothing to do with being a barter intermediate) is what allowed them to remain a meaningful currency for all of human history up until the DS finally eliminated it 50 years ago (after a more than 200 year effort to do so).
I agree with your sentiment, but disagree with your assessment. Silver and gold have real value. People trade for them even though they aren't useful for money. People trade for them even if they have no intention of using them as a storage of wealth or for investment. People want them no matter what and they always will because they are pretty and/or have amazing physical properties for our technology. That is why they are useful as a currency and always will be (or at least for the foreseeable future).
Why do they have value? It's a belief that they do.
The only real value for humans is an expenditure of calories when you get to the root of it no?
What is value? People desired and used them before they were used as currency. Is that not value? People desired them A LOT. They are both beautiful and rare. Is that not value? They have unique physical properties (separate from their lustre) that allow our technology to work. Without them our entire society would be substantially diminished (technically speaking). Is that not value?
Is the only possible value food, and protection from the elements? We are much more complicated than just being biological factories. To ignore that obvious fact is to be a minimalist of absurd degree.