Which leads me to think Q has not read paying m's books. I do not dispute his assessment of the geopolitical situation - I question his "Christian" beliefs and integrity. I also wonder if those endorsements are genuine, found them rather odd. So many people take Q as gospel, maybe we should be more discerning.
Maybe you're wrong about what's in those books.
We have a severe problem in the Church in this country. We are so anemic and powerless it's ridiculous. The apostles would be shocked at what we've become. And if anyone talks about the possibilities of what the Lord is perfectly willing to do - they get called a heretic. Tell you what: history will be on the side of those who LISTENED to what the Holy Spirit is saying.
Where in the Bible is there anything about going to the courts of heaven to get sins erased from records? We confess our sins, ask for forgiveness and the Blood of Jesus avails for us. That's it. Not astral projection and salvation through works. Revelations ends with a warning about taking away or adding to the Words of the Bible - this is adding and some. Am I wrong?
Astral projection and traveling in the spirit are not the same. You will recall that traveling in the spirit is recorded in scripture. I've actually seen what you could call "involuntary" and occult astral projection in a demonized girl and it was pretty horrifying to the girl and everyone who witnessed it.
When Jesus said that we will do greater things than this because He goes to the Father, that means there are OTHER things we will do that He did not do. It is a fallacy to say that because Scripture doesn't mention specific activities of the Holy Spirit that they must be error or heresy, because scripture doesn't mention a LOT of things. If someone says that the Holy Spirit told them to reject Jesus, now you got something. That's heresy. But someone saying that their experience with the Holy Spirit is unfamiliar to YOU therefore it is evil or heresy is wrong and there's nothing scriptural about that stance.
Which leads me to think Q has not read paying m's books. I do not dispute his assessment of the geopolitical situation - I question his "Christian" beliefs and integrity. I also wonder if those endorsements are genuine, found them rather odd. So many people take Q as gospel, maybe we should be more discerning.
Maybe you're wrong about what's in those books. We have a severe problem in the Church in this country. We are so anemic and powerless it's ridiculous. The apostles would be shocked at what we've become. And if anyone talks about the possibilities of what the Lord is perfectly willing to do - they get called a heretic. Tell you what: history will be on the side of those who LISTENED to what the Holy Spirit is saying.
Where in the Bible is there anything about going to the courts of heaven to get sins erased from records? We confess our sins, ask for forgiveness and the Blood of Jesus avails for us. That's it. Not astral projection and salvation through works. Revelations ends with a warning about taking away or adding to the Words of the Bible - this is adding and some. Am I wrong?
Astral projection and traveling in the spirit are not the same. You will recall that traveling in the spirit is recorded in scripture. I've actually seen what you could call "involuntary" and occult astral projection in a demonized girl and it was pretty horrifying to the girl and everyone who witnessed it.
When Jesus said that we will do greater things than this because He goes to the Father, that means there are OTHER things we will do that He did not do. It is a fallacy to say that because Scripture doesn't mention specific activities of the Holy Spirit that they must be error or heresy, because scripture doesn't mention a LOT of things. If someone says that the Holy Spirit told them to reject Jesus, now you got something. That's heresy. But someone saying that their experience with the Holy Spirit is unfamiliar to YOU therefore it is evil or heresy is wrong and there's nothing scriptural about that stance.
Proverbs 26:4-5