Theory about Military Occupation (11.3 Marker) - The Great Awakening

Theory about Military Occupation (11.3 Marker) ?? Theory ??

posted 3 years ago by ostof 3 years ago by ostof +37 / -0

There was a lot of discussion about how the military occupies 'the city state' of Washington DC and how 11.3 (END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS) is a marker. But somehow it does not make sense to me, in the proposed constellation.

So 'Think Mirror' ... what if the military occupies all the rest of the United States, except DC - with DJT still commander-in-chief. In my opinon that would make much more sense regarding the following points mentioned by Q:

11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER
11.6 PROTECTION OF THE POPULATION OF AN OCCUPIED TERRITORY
11.9 LOCAL LAW AND LEGISLATION
11.11 CRIMINAL LAW IN OCCUPIED TERRITORY

see https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/DoD%20Law%20of%20War%20Manual%20-%20June%202015%20Updated%20Dec%202016.pdf?ver=2016-12-13-172036-190

It would also explain, why there were no badges on the uniforms at the military parades (inauguration). And especially why everything is going along as it is at the moment, Biden is president of the United States, but without any facutal military power. The military can not simply arrest people and put them on trails, because it is bound to the rules above.

But it could negotiate with the ousted authority, under which terms the occupation could be ended. Hint: Trials start.

So some questions about this theory for you fellow anons.

Could the military just 'declare' it is no longer the military of the USA? Could it be the occupying power? Fun fact: Q never mentions 'US army' only 'army', but to be fair he mentions 'US military' often.
Could the Space-Force lead this?
Where is the nuclear football now?

4 comments

4 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (4)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– WaraBama 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Ask yourself who is fighting the resistance in the DUMB’s and tunnels. The bad guys have guns and so do our fighters. If it’s a law that states something close to, US Military cannot conduct war on US Who is fighting the bad guys. It’s not US Military, but it’s highly trained military style personnel representing other countries. Our guys are present and they’re picking up the casings. This has been going down for 5 years. Who are our allies doing the work for us on our own soil? Enjoy the show

permalink save report block reply

– Stalkeroflight 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Very well said!!!

– portinan 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I originally thought that the 'occupation' began on March 26th 2020 when Congress passed the CARES act, and the Federal Reserve Bank was officially made part of the U.S. Treasury. I thought occupation would end on March 27th 2021.

But your interpretation makes much more sense. First the military occupies the nation, then they have to worry about protecting the inhabitants and upholding the law as best they can.

– Smittyliason 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Nice, I like your thinking