Pulitzer on Audits: AZ looking good, not so sure about GA - The Great Awakening

Pulitzer on Audits: AZ looking good, not so sure about GA (www.youtube.com)

posted 3 years ago by EarnYourVote 3 years ago by EarnYourVote +62 / -0

6 comments

6 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (6)

sorted by:

▲ -2 ▼

– EarnYourVote [S] -2 points 3 years ago +2 / -4

I am skeptical of Pulitzer and think he is mostly in this for self-promotion. But, if that agenda lines up with the truth getting out, so be it.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– slokill 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I'm guessing you didn't watch his testimony before the GA panel. If you did, you need to think about what he presented more objectively. The day following his testimony GA agreed to his audit. The next day they withdrew that permission. He knows exactly what's going on with the paper ballots and they're afraid of what he'll find.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– RichieAppel 1 point 3 years ago +3 / -2

He’s had a history of fuckery. Most recent I can think of is his “Roman”’sword supposedly found near Oak Island in Canada. Turns out an anthropologist in South Carolina track down the source of this sword and they were tourist items from Rome. They were made to look like vintage swords. ?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Junionthepipeline 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I cant rember if he was scamming or scammed but they took him off fast.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q