I have not worn a mask anywhere since the inception of this con a year ago. Twice to get my haircut and once to get required annual physical. I simply ignore anyone who gives me crap about it. That actually infuriates them even more. I have been thrown out of few stores here and there but the standard medical condition with HIPPA violations usually works no matter what store. I am literally the only person in the state of Vermont that refuses to conform it seems. Just got shamed at the post office by a cucked Karen who actually resorted to physical threats against me. probably because I ignored her whining ass. People we need to unify once and for all against this BS. Until we band together this nonsense is never going to end. Back breathing CO2 and bacteria is 100 times worse long term than catching covid will ever be. The thing that shocks me the most about all of this is the millions of LAWYERS in this country that have done nothing to bring ONE single case against the schools, business', states or federal government to make mask mandates UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Is there any lawyer out there with any balls in this country. If not, and you are a lawyer, can any of you please tell me what I PERSONALLY can do myself to file a suit against a school, business, state or Federal Government to fight for my rights and the rights of my family. Just give me the blueprint, or course of action I need to begin and I will take it from here. I am done and refuse to live this way anymore and I intend to start this ball rolling myself legally if need be. Thank You in advance.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
I understand your frustration. We've got a number of forces working against us. First and foremost is the balancing act required by businesses. If they start letting the anti-maskers (aka "Pro-Truthers) into their stores, they run the risk of scaring off the fearful, which still vastly outnumber us. Regardless of the unlawful state mandates (aka "recommendations), not "laws", it's wholly a FINANCIAL decision on their part.
I was approached by the owner of our local gun store about 6 months ago and, while totally in agreement with our position, he informed me that the "state authorities" visited his business 2-3 times a week knowing many gun owners were not keen on these unlawful mask "recommendations". Anyway, he let me know that they would close his business down if he allowed people to not wear masks, thus destroying his business and livelihood. He literally has no choice. Tough to argue against that.
I've also heard, but cannot confirm, that many practicing attorneys have been subtly "encouraged" to not take on cases of this sort. More than anything else, they've been told they aren't going to win them so don't bother.
There are a number of encouraging large-scale cases underway at the moment, questioning the constitutionality and/or attacking the bogus, rubbish, non-existent science (aka mainstream "scientism") allegedly "supporting" the need for the masks. As you can imagine, they're uber-slow moving, and likely by the time a decision is ever reached, this will all be over. The most encouraging I've found is being tried in Ohio by Thomas Renz. Granted, this isn't a personal case like you're asking about (individual vs. business).
You should check out Pam Popper on Bitchute or YTube, as she's been on point with supporting these cases and rallying support for at least 6 months now. She also runs a website for people to get involved at the local level with the larger effort of eliminating this nonsense. Her website is "Make America Free Again" -> https://makeamericansfreeagain.com/
Another guy I've loved listening to is John Jay (sp?) who is not an attorney, but sure knows his way around all the legalese and rules/codes/acts/statutes out there. He runs a Bitchute channel called "Singletonpress" -- all one word. It's not very popular, but I think it should be. He's put up a dozen videos that are worth the listen IMHO - a good education on all of this. This guy is 100% on point. He helps people out with all kinds of legal nonsense; i.e. taxes, business operations, etc. and appears to be very successful.
Regarding your current frustration, on the personal front, John has made three very interesting and important observations about all of this.
First, that most businesses are what's known in legalese as "Places of public accommodation". In short, this means they cannot discriminate or restrict entry to members of the public for arbitrary reasons, like age, gender, ethnicity, religion, etc. He rightly argues that "medical conditions" fall into this category. In other words, these business can't prevent someone with say AIDS, cancer, diabetes, flu, colds or whatever from entering. Thus, if an individual can't or doesn't want to wear a mask, they can't "legally" deny entry.
Second, he's drilled into the notion of "Duty of Care" business requirements. For example, if somebody breaks a case of coke bottles in the aisle, then the store would have a "Duty of Care" to cordon off that area and clean up the mess preventing customers from slipping and falling. However, businesses are not responsible for notifying or informing their customers of a well-known risk that everybody is aware of. For example, say there were forest fires raging in the area, or earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc. In other words, it's not the duty of the business to protect you from these widely known things. Covfefe-1984 sure fits the bill here.
And thirdly, he rightly suggests that these businesses aren't in any way "medical experts" that are capable of assessing, let alone licensed to assess, the myriad of physical, mental and psychological conditions of the populace at large. As such, what is their liability if they force someone to wear a mask to buy essential goods or services, like groceries, without knowing the damage it could possibly cause to that person? A simple example would be, my mother has told me she sometimes feels faint and lightheaded when at the grocery for extended periods of time. What if she faints and falls? Is the grocery going to be liable for this? If not, then who is? If she was forced to wear the mask against her better judgment, who becomes liable?
On this third point, he has suggested asking the store precisely these questions of indemnity and liability to see if they do indeed have insurance to cover such a situation. Of course they don't, which will of course exacerbate the situation and you'll be faced with a no-win situation yet again here unfortunately.
Anyway, I've researched this pretty carefully over the past year. The bottom line is, the state governments have the businesses by the kajones. This is the fundamental problem. It's a no-win situation at present until people and businesses wake up to the trap of "incorporation", which places our "persons", "property" and "businesses" into the maritime jurisdiction of "Legal Fictions". Within it, we're trapped by "public policy" ( legal codes, statutes, acts, ordinances, "mandates", etc.)
However, there's a simple way out. But we don't yet have the "numbers" to make an impact. It's a slog slowly picking up steam however and I'm encouraged by the numbers of people waking up!
Until then, I'm right there with you. There is no good solution. I've happened to find a grocery store that doesn't force masks, so I now shop exclusively with them, even though they don't carry all the stuff I want. It's a small sacrifice but well worth it to support them. When it comes to buying ammo, the last thing I want to do is put a loyal patriot out of business, so I make the exception for him. And on the rare occasion these days when I go out to eat at a restaurant, I do the ludicrous "masked-walk-to-the-table" so as not to upset the group I'm with.
The bottom line is, I'd recommend doing your level best to find ways to dance around this nonsense as best you can. Most grocery stores in my area have online ordering, and most businesses have curbside pickup as well. I take full advantage of these options as I know I can't win the "mask battle" at present as they can accommodate in this way.
There's no doubt we're "in the right" on this. Unfortunately, being "right" doesn't add up to much these days in this dystopian inverted reality that's slowly breaking down. As such, we've just got to suck it up, stand our ground when appropriate, and when the opportunity arises, speak our truth so more and more will wake up from they insanity currently underway.
I'd highly recommend you join up with Pam's group, get involved on her teleconferences, hook up with local like-minded people, and help educate those in your area as best you can. It's a rewarding and necessary endeavor IMHO.
I hope you find this helpful and I wish you luck in navigating through this nonsense in as much ease and grace as possible for the time being.
Good luck!!!