And yet, despite decades of attempts in numerous labs, life has not even come close to being "created". There is a ruling process in the universe, called entropy (things tend toward disorder). Life evolving from nothing is a total violation of that ruling process, and the reason the idea that life "evolved" from nothing is so ridiculous (as is the most outrageous theory of all "The Big Bang").
Labs have absolutely HAVE recreated ALL the necessary principals that time uses to form the complexity of man from random elements.
Amino acids and nucleic acids HAVE been formed in the laboratory under primordial conditions. They HAVE bound into chains, these chains DO have the capacity in certain sequences to self replication, and that's literally all you have to demonstrated to get natural selection going. Literally everything else follows from that.
Give a laboratory the size of planet earth a billion years and they can 'artificially' 'create' life. That's a testament both to how rare the events are, but also how possible given how much time has passed and how big the universe is.
But the critical point, that every step necessary being demonstrated, has been met.
The big bang is something entirely separate, but you're selling god short by YOU arbitrarily deciding for some weird reason that evolution is incompatible with god's ability.
Saying the components of a living cell have been created in a lab, and is therefore, an indication that a living cell could be created if enough time is allowed is like having a monkey accidentally type a five-word sentence on a typewriter, and therefore, given enough time, Shakespeare's complete works could eventually be typed by that monkey. Yes, theoretically it could happen, but there is a big difference between theory and reality, between possibility, and essentially impossibility.
Except billions of years is a shit ton of time, primordial earth is huge, nucleic acids are a common comparatively stable product of these environments, them joining together in those conditions is not rare, and these interactions occur thousands of times a second at a scale we don't appreciate at this level.
All you need is the right order, and we're not talking a Shakespeare length play, but only a few hundred at most to get self replication.
Not only is it possible, but probable.
And that's just on earth. When you take a galaxy as large as ours, with as many planets as there are and then as many galaxies as there are, even with the most conservative estimates you might plug in for those probabilities it's near mathematically impossible for self replicating nucleic acids NOT to form, but because how life as we know it is the clear result of it one can conclude that this universe, reality and creation as we know it, exists specifically for us to be the result.
We're not talking a hundred monkeys in a room over a millennia. We're talking trillions upon trillions over a billion years each on a hundred million worlds each in a trillion galaxies.
Those metaphorical monkeys in those numbers over that timeframe are going to write Romeo and Juliet, the Bible, War and Peace, an Pi to a thousand digits. But they only have to write just one just once. If you're still pessimistic, Earth doesn't need to be here after all, Earth need only be where it happened. That's what God did, it's far more amazing, and you won't allow yourself to appreciate it just because some retard atheists told you it proves god doesn't exist for some reason.
Do I sound like someone who doesn't believe God did all we see on Earth and the universe? As I said, theoretically, with enough time, any random sequence of events could happen, given enough time (like flipping a coin a billion times in a row and having it come up heads every time), but remember, the universe is at most, 5 billion years old, correct?, so therefore, not even a fraction of the time required for the outrageous sequence of events you postulate to occur to produce life.
And yet, despite decades of attempts in numerous labs, life has not even come close to being "created". There is a ruling process in the universe, called entropy (things tend toward disorder). Life evolving from nothing is a total violation of that ruling process, and the reason the idea that life "evolved" from nothing is so ridiculous (as is the most outrageous theory of all "The Big Bang").
Life took billions of years.
Labs have absolutely HAVE recreated ALL the necessary principals that time uses to form the complexity of man from random elements.
Amino acids and nucleic acids HAVE been formed in the laboratory under primordial conditions. They HAVE bound into chains, these chains DO have the capacity in certain sequences to self replication, and that's literally all you have to demonstrated to get natural selection going. Literally everything else follows from that.
Give a laboratory the size of planet earth a billion years and they can 'artificially' 'create' life. That's a testament both to how rare the events are, but also how possible given how much time has passed and how big the universe is.
But the critical point, that every step necessary being demonstrated, has been met.
The big bang is something entirely separate, but you're selling god short by YOU arbitrarily deciding for some weird reason that evolution is incompatible with god's ability.
Saying the components of a living cell have been created in a lab, and is therefore, an indication that a living cell could be created if enough time is allowed is like having a monkey accidentally type a five-word sentence on a typewriter, and therefore, given enough time, Shakespeare's complete works could eventually be typed by that monkey. Yes, theoretically it could happen, but there is a big difference between theory and reality, between possibility, and essentially impossibility.
Except billions of years is a shit ton of time, primordial earth is huge, nucleic acids are a common comparatively stable product of these environments, them joining together in those conditions is not rare, and these interactions occur thousands of times a second at a scale we don't appreciate at this level.
All you need is the right order, and we're not talking a Shakespeare length play, but only a few hundred at most to get self replication.
Not only is it possible, but probable.
And that's just on earth. When you take a galaxy as large as ours, with as many planets as there are and then as many galaxies as there are, even with the most conservative estimates you might plug in for those probabilities it's near mathematically impossible for self replicating nucleic acids NOT to form, but because how life as we know it is the clear result of it one can conclude that this universe, reality and creation as we know it, exists specifically for us to be the result.
We're not talking a hundred monkeys in a room over a millennia. We're talking trillions upon trillions over a billion years each on a hundred million worlds each in a trillion galaxies.
Those metaphorical monkeys in those numbers over that timeframe are going to write Romeo and Juliet, the Bible, War and Peace, an Pi to a thousand digits. But they only have to write just one just once. If you're still pessimistic, Earth doesn't need to be here after all, Earth need only be where it happened. That's what God did, it's far more amazing, and you won't allow yourself to appreciate it just because some retard atheists told you it proves god doesn't exist for some reason.
Do I sound like someone who doesn't believe God did all we see on Earth and the universe? As I said, theoretically, with enough time, any random sequence of events could happen, given enough time (like flipping a coin a billion times in a row and having it come up heads every time), but remember, the universe is at most, 5 billion years old, correct?, so therefore, not even a fraction of the time required for the outrageous sequence of events you postulate to occur to produce life.