What is the mathematical probability of the comms being a coincidence, can some one give me a few concrete examples? maybe the math..etc? I believe in Q myself but I lack the proper statistical data to put a few that I am red pilling over the finish line. thank you.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
I can't call myself a mathfag by any means, but I'm not sure how you could quantify communication between two parties in mathematical terms.
Symbolism is a language, like sign language. Two parties understand that they are communicating with each other through a specific medium and can decipher messages through what is said, what is not said, and superfluous details. Performance art-style actions (sometimes killings) are also taken with the intent of the event being reported on and understood by the receiver as a message.
This is by far the best and most detailed blog I've seen about symbolism. A gold mine:
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/
This is not related directly to your post, but is useful in redpilling because it's not political, therefore, not threatening. Only 10.5 minutes and explains how things are manipulated and fabricated. Very well worth watching. https://archive.org/details/attkissonsharylastroturf
Yeah from the Pompeo's flag and lock tweet and private tweet 3 minutes later on Jan 16th, 2021, in regards to Q post 503. It doesn't even account for the timing.
I tried to do some probability analysis on the chances of decoding that binary message into a coherent Q message that went directly with the Q post. With widest boundaries possibly imaginable and then some, it was less than 1 in 1 million for the message to be coherent and connect with the Q post at all.
But in reality the message was much cleaner and the boundaries were much narrower, so basically mathematically unable to be a coincidence.
Anyone know how to link a pdf? It's like 20 pages.
*Edit, it's kind of complicated to explain this proof but it's very solid. Basically, Pompeo sent out the message ",QF¦QQF" in his tweet at 5:00pm. 3 minutes later he posted on his private account at 5:03 with a single Q sprinkled in the post, to signify Q post 503 which reads
Original missing Q
Revised Including Q
Coincidence?
Please, if you haven't looked into that one. IT IS A MUST. And if I can find a way to link my attempt at the likelihood of this I will.
**Edit, I remembered that link sharing services like gofile exist, this might work: https://gofile.io/d/4EZVFr
LOL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaMfgPMA8f0
You would need to frame your question better. As asked, the answer could lie anywhere between almost impossible to a near certainty.
Take for example the recent "trip" quote by Q. Depending on assumptions, this could simply be a drop posted by Q that Scavino realized he could take out of context after the Biden event occurred. I know because I just had a conversation about this with another very intelligent friend of mine who is an avid leftist.
So what to me was a highly unlikely sequence of events proving that Biden must be under the control of team Trump, to him was an after the fact pattern that was chosen out of millions of possibilities, one of which just happened to match by chance. So the only coincidence involved was the 3 year delta that was within 1 day of the event. Meaning there could have been 3 such days in a year, or a probability of around 0.82%.
But over 60 days of a Biden presidency, the chance of an event happening with each day offering a 0.82% probability is 1 - 0.9918^60 = 38.98% likelihood. So the end result was that he was singularly unimpressed.
It all comes down entirely to assumptions, your particular values, and beliefs.
Interesting thank you