And yet nobody can read. My point was that just because the Wi-Fi was open to the voting machines does NOT mean that votes could be changed on the voting machines. Actually read OP’s title of their post.
I am not taking a position that the voting machines were safe or free from attack, etc. My position is that simply because a voting machine connected to Wi-Fi without a password does not automagically mean that votes can be changed on the voting machine.
For me it rather looks you can't read things mentioned to you.
My point was that just because the Wi-Fi was open to the voting machines does NOT mean that votes could be changed on the voting machines
It doesn't mean it were changed,but definitely mean can be changed. If not safe from attack that means votes can be changed.Anyone could hack it with ease. 8 year old script kiddie would do it so I say - anyone.Period.
If you interpret that "anyone" means caveman from the street not knowing computers except turning on and off and typing a text,browsing porn or watching video could do that you would be right - such person were unable to do that.But probably only such - anyone with basics able to download and copy-paste exploits would hack it.Period.
The point is also you assume the rest of system were secured. But being sincere there had to be complete idiot to configure this shit those way,and probably the rest too was such F.U.B.A.R. system like we see on the examples of SSIDs and passsword - it would be strange if ladmin (if not saboteur) would fuck only those things. It rather suggests that those network were open like the door of a country barn.
Of course we don't have binary or source of voting application - correct. (If we will have it then probably we will have to use some tool for RE Q mentioned),but I would bet for a beer that those dominion app was fucked up or has backdoor too.
Of course it isn't hard proof of voter fraud - correct.But for example for some circumstantial trial this thing would be useful nevertheless.
And yet nobody can read. My point was that just because the Wi-Fi was open to the voting machines does NOT mean that votes could be changed on the voting machines. Actually read OP’s title of their post.
I am not taking a position that the voting machines were safe or free from attack, etc. My position is that simply because a voting machine connected to Wi-Fi without a password does not automagically mean that votes can be changed on the voting machine.
For me it rather looks you can't read things mentioned to you.
It doesn't mean it were changed,but definitely mean can be changed. If not safe from attack that means votes can be changed.Anyone could hack it with ease. 8 year old script kiddie would do it so I say - anyone.Period.
If you interpret that "anyone" means caveman from the street not knowing computers except turning on and off and typing a text,browsing porn or watching video could do that you would be right - such person were unable to do that.But probably only such - anyone with basics able to download and copy-paste exploits would hack it.Period.
The point is also you assume the rest of system were secured. But being sincere there had to be complete idiot to configure this shit those way,and probably the rest too was such F.U.B.A.R. system like we see on the examples of SSIDs and passsword - it would be strange if ladmin (if not saboteur) would fuck only those things. It rather suggests that those network were open like the door of a country barn.
Of course we don't have binary or source of voting application - correct. (If we will have it then probably we will have to use some tool for RE Q mentioned),but I would bet for a beer that those dominion app was fucked up or has backdoor too.
Of course it isn't hard proof of voter fraud - correct.But for example for some circumstantial trial this thing would be useful nevertheless.